BSV Intel the signal, daily
Edition 235
Saturday · October 24, 2026
BSV Network · 24 hours ending October 24, 09:28 UTC

Edition 235

Edited by Bridget Doran · Scanned 09:34 UTC, October 24 · Blocks 972,299 → 972,442 · 4,520,549 transactions
Largest transaction
$1.26M
73,155 BSV · major tier
Avg block time
10.2min
near schedule
Throughput
52tx/s
peak 1113 tx/s
BSV price
$17.29
▼ 2.0% · 24h
№ 01 Chain Health

10 miners, on schedule

10 miners produced today's 144 blocks at an average interval of 10.2 min — on schedule relative to the 10-minute target.

7 min
Median interval
half the blocks faster
55
Fast blocks1
under 5 min
667,650 txs
Busiest block
block 972,360
Fast and slow blocks are an expected feature of Proof of Work, not a defect. Block timing follows a Poisson process (random spacing around a steady average), so clusters of fast or slow blocks happen even when hashrate is unchanged.
Block cadence · 144 blocks · 24.2h
Fast (<5 min) · 55 Normal · 68 Slow (>20 min) · 21
For the technical reader

Block timing. Mean interval 610.5 seconds (10.2 min) over 143 measured intervals across 144 blocks; median 420 seconds (7 min). Range 5 s to 2224 s (37.1 min).

Cadence. Average interval 10.2 min — on schedule relative to the 10-minute target. 10 miners produced today's blocks.

Largest block. Block 972,360 at 667,650 transactions, the peak load in the window. Avg tx/block across all 144 blocks was 31,393.

№ 02 Teranode Network

12 Teranode operators visible on the public network

At least 12 operators are announcing on the public gossip network (2 acting as public relays), running versions from v0.0.0-20261022234608-unknown to v0.16.0. This is the publicly-visible set only; others almost certainly run Teranode without announcing.

12
Visible
announcing on mesh
2
Public relays
accept external tx
11
Caught up → tip
synced to latest block
Versions in use · 12 operators
v0.0.0-20261022234608-unknown 1 · v0.0.0-20261023070124-unknown 1 · v0.0.0-20261023184154-4e23a563d 1 · v0.15.9 1 · v0.16.0-beta-15 2 · v0.16.0 6
For the technical reader

Source: node_status messages on the public BSV gossip layer, observed by our own libp2p listener and deduplicated by peer ID. This counts the publicly-announcing set only — a node that does not broadcast status, or runs inside a private cluster, will not appear, so read it as a floor, not a full census.

“Caught up” means within one block of the chain tip (currently 972,450). Stalled or still-syncing nodes are excluded from that count. “Public relay” here means a node that publicly forwards gossip to the rest of the mesh; only two do, and both announce under the same operator label and share infrastructure, so the public mesh’s reachability appears to lean on a single operator.

№ 03 Mining Distribution

10 miners produced today's 144 blocks

CUVVE led at 22.9%. Distribution within normal range.

CUVVE 22.9%
Kryptex 22.2%
SA100 13.2%
qdlnk 10.4%
GorillaPool 7.6%
taal.com 6.9%
taal.com_Teranode 4.9%
KardanPool 4.9%
molepool.com 3.5%
Bitofsin 2.8%
Unrecognized 0.7%

Unrecognized coinbase tags: Jverify, don't trust · bsv.cx · TANSTAAFL · we escaped Plato's cave! ×1

For the technical reader

Miners are identified by their coinbase tag, a free-text field the block's miner writes into its own coinbase transaction. That miner may be a pool or someone mining solo. The tag is self-reported and unsigned: consensus does not check it, and Teranode reads the same field to name miners. Blocks with no tag, or a tag not on our list, appear as unrecognized. The _Teranode suffix (e.g., taal.com_Teranode) marks blocks whose coinbase tag mentions Teranode, which is also self-reported rather than a formal protocol marker. GorillaPool.io may also be running a Teranode (observed in the Teranode explorer); when blocks become attributable to that node, they would appear with the suffix as well.

Block counts: CUVVE 33, Kryptex 32, SA100 19, qdlnk 15, GorillaPool 11, taal.com 10, taal.com_Teranode 7, KardanPool 7, molepool.com 5, Bitofsin 4, Unrecognized 1. 143 of 144 blocks identified.

№ 04 Large Transactions

249 transactions of 100 BSV or more

Blocks 972,299–972,442 · 144 blocks, about 24 hours

1 was over 10,000 BSV, a combined ~$1.3 million. Of the 91,641 BSV in the 4 largest, 77,180 went back to the sending addresses. 4 addresses paid in the largest transactions had not appeared in a 1,000+ BSV transaction since tracking began on March 2.

1
Major
> 10K BSV
~$172,910+
17
Notable
1K – 10K BSV
~$17,291 – 172,910
231
Significant
100 – 1K BSV
~$1,729 – 17,291
Largest transactions
73,154.74BSV
≈ $1,264,916 09734fe923…
2 → 2 Neutral
New address1HZyf7R9vDEb…received 126 BSV · 73,029 BSV back to the sender
9,571.98BSV
≈ $165,509 1de43ad146…
63 → 1 Consolidation
Seen before1G47mSr3oANX…seen since March 4 in 474 large transactions · received 9,572 BSV
4,763.16BSV
≈ $82,360 0b58dca671…
4 → 2 Neutral
Seen before1MAygYBXf11k…seen since September 13 in 4 large transactions · received 3,000 BSV
4,151.51BSV
≈ $71,784 925bedfb24…
1 → 2 Neutral
New address13rQLiEEnRDR…received 0.1 BSV · 4,151 BSV back to the sender

Also new since March 2: 16M8f2mRLtru… (1,763 BSV received), 1LqzZ5ufokY7… (1,500 BSV received).

Large holders we follow · 50

None of them ended these blocks 25,000 BSV or more up or down.

How to read this section

Large transactions are transactions in these blocks whose outputs add up to 100 BSV or more. Major > 10K BSV; Notable 1K – 10K BSV; Significant 100 – 1K BSV. The 100-BSV floor excludes ordinary day-to-day payments. A transaction's size includes change returned to the sender, so it is how much value the transaction handled, not how much changed hands. The line under each transaction shows what was actually paid out.

Shape is input-count → output-count. Pattern is heuristic: Neutral is a typical payment (one payment plus change); Consolidation is many inputs to few outputs (UTXO cleanup or sweep); Distribution is few inputs to many outputs (payouts, batch send).

The address under a transaction is its largest output that is not change. An output paid back to one of the transaction's own input addresses counts as change (“back to the sender”). A wallet that sends change to a fresh address can't be told apart this way, so the address shown may still be the sender's. Internal transfer means the sending addresses and every address paid belong to the same holder we follow (below), so the coins likely stayed with one owner.

New address means the address has not appeared, as sender or receiver, in any stored large transaction since tracking began on March 2, 2026. Stored transactions are mostly 1,000 BSV and up; before October 16, 2026 only each day's top 10 were stored. A new address could be a new large holder, an address that only moved smaller amounts before, or a long-dormant address coming back. Seen before gives the first date the address appeared and how many stored transactions it has been in.

Large holders we follow are groups of addresses we treat as one owner, because they have been spent together as inputs or linked by hand from on-chain evidence. For each one, we add up every stored transaction touching its addresses in these blocks: coins received minus coins sent. Moves between a holder's own addresses cancel out, so a large transfer that only shuffles coins internally shows near zero. A holder is listed when it ends the blocks 25,000 BSV or more up or down. Addresses outside these groups are not counted, so a large payment to a new address does not show up here.

All classifications are probabilistic. Grouping addresses into a holder is an inference from on-chain links, not proof of common ownership, and no identity is claimed.

№ 05 Throughput & Market
BSV / USD
$17.29
▼ 2.0% over 24h
Throughput, avg
52tx/s
peak 1113 tx/s · 10-min window
Avg tx / block31,393
Max tx / block667,650
Total transactions4,520,549
10-min peak667,650
For the technical reader

TPS is computed over the 24.2 hours of the scan window in 10-minute intervals, not per block. The peak is the busiest 10-minute window observed (667,650 transactions, ≈ 1113 tx/s for that window).

Price source: real-time quote at scan completion. 24h change is from a rolling 24-hour spot reference.

№ 06 Transaction Velocity

Activity by hour, across 26 hours

4,520,549 transactions mapped to 10-minute windows. The brightest cell is the busiest window of the day.

09121518210003060910:00:10:20:30:40:5009:00 UTC — 0 txs09:10 UTC — 26 txs09:20 UTC — 280 txs09:30 UTC — 0 txs09:40 UTC — 44,171 txs09:50 UTC — 363 txs10:00 UTC — 343 txs10:10 UTC — 410 txs10:20 UTC — 0 txs10:30 UTC — 34 txs10:40 UTC — 1,025 txs10:50 UTC — 219 txs11:00 UTC — 286 txs11:10 UTC — 0 txs11:20 UTC — 0 txs11:30 UTC — 1,580 txs11:40 UTC — 1,011 txs11:50 UTC — 31 txs12:00 UTC — 434 txs12:10 UTC — 0 txs12:20 UTC — 259,488 txs12:30 UTC — 0 txs12:40 UTC — 548,049 txs548k12:50 UTC — 68 txs13:00 UTC — 326 txs13:10 UTC — 8 txs13:20 UTC — 1,585 txs13:30 UTC — 0 txs13:40 UTC — 0 txs13:50 UTC — 7,223 txs14:00 UTC — 0 txs14:10 UTC — 52,231 txs14:20 UTC — 24,271 txs14:30 UTC — 0 txs14:40 UTC — 0 txs14:50 UTC — 795 txs15:00 UTC — 3,270 txs15:10 UTC — 0 txs15:20 UTC — 1,091 txs15:30 UTC — 437 txs15:40 UTC — 0 txs15:50 UTC — 5,837 txs16:00 UTC — 27 txs16:10 UTC — 0 txs16:20 UTC — 0 txs16:30 UTC — 32,509 txs16:40 UTC — 2,883 txs16:50 UTC — 0 txs17:00 UTC — 15,958 txs17:10 UTC — 132,477 txs17:20 UTC — 175,590 txs17:30 UTC — 0 txs17:40 UTC — 39 txs17:50 UTC — 370,592 txs371k18:00 UTC — 148,006 txs18:10 UTC — 436,093 txs436k18:20 UTC — 667,650 txs668k18:30 UTC — 174,299 txs18:40 UTC — 8 txs18:50 UTC — 174,880 txs19:00 UTC — 2,307 txs19:10 UTC — 4,349 txs19:20 UTC — 0 txs19:30 UTC — 0 txs19:40 UTC — 10,169 txs19:50 UTC — 3 txs20:00 UTC — 1,489 txs20:10 UTC — 245 txs20:20 UTC — 0 txs20:30 UTC — 0 txs20:40 UTC — 1,036 txs20:50 UTC — 0 txs21:00 UTC — 2,504 txs21:10 UTC — 0 txs21:20 UTC — 0 txs21:30 UTC — 1,397 txs21:40 UTC — 0 txs21:50 UTC — 0 txs22:00 UTC — 492 txs22:10 UTC — 0 txs22:20 UTC — 1,435 txs22:30 UTC — 0 txs22:40 UTC — 3,897 txs22:50 UTC — 18 txs23:00 UTC — 0 txs23:10 UTC — 252,056 txs23:20 UTC — 0 txs23:30 UTC — 0 txs23:40 UTC — 781 txs23:50 UTC — 0 txs00:00 UTC — 0 txs00:10 UTC — 0 txs00:20 UTC — 2,724 txs00:30 UTC — 0 txs00:40 UTC — 46 txs00:50 UTC — 0 txs01:00 UTC — 787 txs01:10 UTC — 0 txs01:20 UTC — 0 txs01:30 UTC — 49 txs01:40 UTC — 875 txs01:50 UTC — 0 txs02:00 UTC — 250 txs02:10 UTC — 121 txs02:20 UTC — 1,283 txs02:30 UTC — 62 txs02:40 UTC — 0 txs02:50 UTC — 0 txs03:00 UTC — 6,502 txs03:10 UTC — 35,300 txs03:20 UTC — 9 txs03:30 UTC — 6,156 txs03:40 UTC — 0 txs03:50 UTC — 1,074 txs04:00 UTC — 91,533 txs04:10 UTC — 87,278 txs04:20 UTC — 0 txs04:30 UTC — 0 txs04:40 UTC — 223,028 txs04:50 UTC — 0 txs05:00 UTC — 0 txs05:10 UTC — 0 txs05:20 UTC — 485,104 txs485k05:30 UTC — 0 txs05:40 UTC — 0 txs05:50 UTC — 1,494 txs06:00 UTC — 266 txs06:10 UTC — 1,024 txs06:20 UTC — 43 txs06:30 UTC — 0 txs06:40 UTC — 0 txs06:50 UTC — 0 txs07:00 UTC — 71 txs07:10 UTC — 410 txs07:20 UTC — 1,873 txs07:30 UTC — 1,342 txs07:40 UTC — 0 txs07:50 UTC — 877 txs08:00 UTC — 0 txs08:10 UTC — 43 txs08:20 UTC — 1,292 txs08:30 UTC — 310 txs08:40 UTC — 100 txs08:50 UTC — 409 txs09:00 UTC — 349 txs09:10 UTC — 0 txs09:20 UTC — 384 txs09:30 UTC — 0 txs09:40 UTC — 0 txs09:50 UTC — 0 txs10:00 UTC — 0 txs10:10 UTC — 0 txs10:20 UTC — 0 txs10:30 UTC — 0 txs10:40 UTC — 0 txs10:50 UTC — 0 txsActivity:High
Peak 10-min window: 667,650 txs Coverage: 144 blocks · 24.2h 10-23 09:13 UTC → 10-24 09:28 UTC
For the technical reader

Dark cells indicate 10-minute windows where no block was mined: a natural result of the Poisson process governing Proof of Work.2 Transactions broadcast during those windows appear in the next mined block.

Each row = one hour of the scan. Each column = a 10-minute bucket within that hour. Read left-to-right within a row, then down to the next hour.

Poisson process. A random event process where events occur independently at a stable average rate, but with unpredictable spacing. Block times have a 10-minute average but individual intervals scatter widely; that's not a bug, it's how the math works.
№ 07 On-chain Activity

9.1 million outputs, by purpose

The TxBlaster service produced 47.7% of transactions, posting paired payment and data-publication outputs continuously. The breakdown below isolates the remaining 52.3% so other activity is readable.

A note on storage. OP_RETURN data is prunable: nodes can discard it without breaking consensus, but reading it back requires running an indexer. UTXO-resident patterns (STAS tokens, spendable metadata, ordinal envelopes) remain in the chain's state and are recoverable from any pruned node. As BSV scales, the architectural direction is toward UTXO-resident data, not OP_RETURN.
All transactions, by source
TxBlaster · 47.7%
52.3%
2,155,019 tx 2,365,530 tx · all other
Excluding TxBlaster3 · 4,838,153 outputs
Payment 89.1% 4,311,828
P2PKH 4,273,910 · P2PK 37,901 · Multisig 17
Data Publication 10.7% 518,767
OP_RETURN 515,343 · Ordinal envelopes 3,296 · Spendable metadata 128
Contracts & Tokens 0.16% 7,558
STAS Gen 3: 810 · Custom locking: 6,748 · 12 unique structures

Of 526,325 non-payment outputs in this window, 97.9% were prunable (OP_RETURN) and 2.1% were UTXO-resident. Pruning is permitted by consensus today but not generally practiced — the architectural advantage of UTXO-resident data materializes as throughput scales toward Teranode-class capacity.

Method · how non-payment outputs are embedded
OP_RETURN 515,343Spendable metadata 128Ordinal envelope 3,296STAS Gen 3 810Custom locking 6,748
TxBlaster is an identified, automated service that posts paired P2PK + OP_RETURN transactions continuously. We count it separately not because it's less legitimate (every fee-paid valid transaction is real chain activity), but because at 48% of transaction count today, it would visually overwhelm everything else. The numbers above show what the other activity looks like.
For the technical reader

Purpose classifies outputs by what they're locked to:

Payment: P2PKH, P2PK, multisig (spendable value).
Data Publication: OP_RETURN, ordinal envelopes, spendable metadata (carrying data).
Contracts: STAS tokens, custom locking scripts (programmable spend conditions).

Spendable metadata (heuristic): scripts with signature verification followed by data removed via OP_DROP. Metadata isn't consumed by validation logic but remains on-chain in the UTXO set.

Unique structures: a contract structure is a normalized script skeleton with variable data (hashes, signatures, pubkeys) removed. 12 unique structures observed today across 7,558 contract outputs.

№ 08 Protocols & Content

What people published, and how it was framed

Open standards used to format data on-chain, and the MIME types declared in those publications.

Protocol · open standards defining data format
MAP 47,971AIP 22,0301Sat-Ordinal 3,297B:// 2,766Metanet4 1,737BSV-21 1,066STAS 232BSV-20 43
Metanet (the original). The 2018-2019 nChain protocol: a 4-byte "meta" push in OP_RETURN that defines a DAG of parent-txid-linked records. Not to be confused with the newer BRC-100 "Metanet" wallet/overlay ecosystem, which uses the same word for a different thing.
Content Type · MIME types in declared inscriptions
text/markdown 2,310application/op-ns 1,962application/bsv-20 1,132image/webp 435text/plain 210image/jpeg 132application/json 62application/octet-stream 59
For the technical reader

Content Types are MIME declarations sourced from two structures: ordinal envelopes (1Sat-style spendable inscriptions) and B:// protocol OP_RETURN publications. Outputs that don't declare a MIME type aren't counted here.

application/bsv-20 covers both BSV-20 and BSV-21: both protocols declare "p":"bsv-20" in their JSON and most inscriptions inherit the legacy MIME type. Protocol differentiation happens via JSON fields (tick = BSV-20 ticker mode; sym/id = BSV-21 tickerless mode).

№ 09 Overlay Directory

157 SHIP endpoints · 150 SLAP endpoints

BRC-88 topic registrations announce who is hosting which overlay services on chain.

SHIP · intake side
157endpoints
across 96 topic managers
SLAP · query side
150endpoints
across 90 lookup services
Top topic managers · SHIP (of 96)
tm_template 18tm_uhrp 16tm_plite 15tm_users 11tm_identity 10
Top lookup services · SLAP (of 90)
ls_template 17ls_uhrp 15ls_identity 10ls_users 10ls_plite 10
Directory topics tm_ship (27) · tm_slap (27) · ls_ship (25) · ls_slap (25)
For the technical reader

BRC-88 SHIP/SLAP. Topic registrations on chain that announce which overlay services a node hosts. SHIP is the intake side: which topic managers (tm_ names) a node accepts transactions for. SLAP is the query side: which lookup services (ls_ names) a node answers queries for.

endpoints = unique (URL, identity key) pairs. advertisements = signed unspent UTXOs on chain, each declaring one endpoint hosts one topic manager or lookup service. Names come in pairs per overlay, e.g. tm_uhrp (advertised via SHIP) and ls_uhrp (advertised via SLAP). SHIP and SLAP are overlays themselves, so ls_ship is a lookup service and is advertised via SLAP, despite the name.

Snapshot from 2026-10-24 11:15 UTC. Counts come from the four trackers hardcoded into the BSV SDK (overlay-us-1, overlay-eu-1, overlay-ap-1, users.bapp.dev). BSV apps query these to find which servers host the overlay topics they need.

№ 10 Identifiable Activity

Applications and tokens with recognizable fingerprints

Twetch led identifiable activity at 20,910 transactions. Most chain activity carries no such identifier; the names below are services whose on-chain shape is recognizable from prior analysis.

Twetch 20,910Teragun 11,506AIRCHIVE 2,575TreeChat 1,700dxs 626Indelible 605OYO 172MNEE 55BSV Live Master 49mintBlue 403D Ordi 36memo.cash 26BSV Feed/View 6GaiaLog 1
Application Token Media / NFT
For the technical reader

Patterns are matched against a curated catalog of known protocols and application signatures: MAP tags, B:// envelopes, AIP, OPUB, ordinal mime declarations, custom STAS structures. Some come from WoC tags; others are identified through analysis. New patterns are added editorially as they emerge.

Counts are unique transactions touching each application's recognizable structures. A transaction can match more than one pattern.

№ 11 Script of the Day

Programmable Contract

CONTRACT · selected from 6,748 candidates

Programmable Contract with a 108-byte payload

What it does. This script uses conditional logic (OP_IF/OP_ELSE), byte manipulation (OP_SPLIT/OP_CAT), or hash operations to enforce spending conditions beyond simple signature verification.

Why it matters. Demonstrates BSV's full scripting capability for programmable money and stateful applications.

TX ae10f3a0ab… Block 972,299 108 script bytes
Opcodes used
2DROPDUPHASH160EQUALVERIFYCHECKSIG
Script preview
a501 e029881b7a5d46ac172b13464c20c139952a42afb034496b8dff48a56c0b3d0300000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 524547 OP_2DROP OP_2DROP OP_DUP OP_HASH160 180b72d92e5d52be07f669c2f335575b3baa72da OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG
Skeleton
a501 <DATA> <DATA> 524547 OP_2DROP OP_2DROP OP_DUP OP_HASH160 <DATA> OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG
For the technical reader

Selection is editorial: one script per day from a curated category (Data Carrier, Token Mint, Complex Contract, Hash Puzzle, etc.). Candidate count shows how many similar scripts appeared in the same window.

The script preview above is the actual on-chain ASM (truncated for display); the skeleton normalizes pushes to <DATA> for pattern comparison across transactions. Opcodes shown are the unique ones present in the script, not the sequence order.

Support BSV Intel
Every classification in this brief came from a query I wrote, on infrastructure I built. If it's useful to you, sats keep it shipping.
HandCash $bridget33
BSV address 177bRhNJAioCgMyYCaKTJpauXpgHnUfWnK
Telegram @bsvintel_bot
send /subscribe for daily updates