BSV Intel the signal, daily
Edition 230
Monday · October 19, 2026
BSV Network · 24 hours ending October 19, 09:22 UTC

Edition 230

Edited by Bridget Doran · Scanned 09:31 UTC, October 19 · Blocks 971,574 → 971,717 · 314,823 transactions
Largest transaction
$421K
23,880 BSV · major tier
Avg block time
11.3min
near schedule
Throughput
3tx/s
peak 194 tx/s
BSV price
$17.62
▼ 1.5% · 24h
№ 01 Chain Health

11 miners, on schedule

11 miners produced today's 144 blocks at an average interval of 11.3 min — on schedule relative to the 10-minute target.

8.1 min
Median interval
half the blocks faster
47
Fast blocks1
under 5 min
116,649 txs
Busiest block
block 971,656
Fast and slow blocks are an expected feature of Proof of Work, not a defect. Block timing follows a Poisson process (random spacing around a steady average), so clusters of fast or slow blocks happen even when hashrate is unchanged.
Block cadence · 144 blocks · 27h
Fast (<5 min) · 47 Normal · 76 Slow (>20 min) · 21
For the technical reader

Block timing. Mean interval 679.0 seconds (11.3 min) over 143 measured intervals across 144 blocks; median 483 seconds (8.1 min). Range 2 s to 3065 s (51.1 min). One sub-3-second interval observed.

Cadence. Average interval 11.3 min — on schedule relative to the 10-minute target. 11 miners produced today's blocks.

Largest block. Block 971,656 at 116,649 transactions, the peak load in the window. Avg tx/block across all 144 blocks was 2,186.

№ 02 Teranode Network

11 Teranode operators visible on the public network

At least 11 operators are announcing on the public gossip network (2 acting as public relays), running versions from v0.0.0-20261013192217-9f5d28108 to v0.16.0. This is the publicly-visible set only; others almost certainly run Teranode without announcing.

11
Visible
announcing on mesh
2
Public relays
accept external tx
11
Caught up → tip
synced to latest block
Versions in use · 11 operators
v0.0.0-20261013192217-9f5d28108 1 · v0.0.0-20261016060925-unknown 1 · v0.0.0-20261017190939-unknown 1 · v0.15.9 1 · v0.16.0-beta-15 2 · v0.16.0 5
For the technical reader

Source: node_status messages on the public BSV gossip layer, observed by our own libp2p listener and deduplicated by peer ID. This counts the publicly-announcing set only — a node that does not broadcast status, or runs inside a private cluster, will not appear, so read it as a floor, not a full census.

“Caught up” means within one block of the chain tip (currently 971,729). Stalled or still-syncing nodes are excluded from that count. “Public relay” here means a node that publicly forwards gossip to the rest of the mesh; only two do, and both announce under the same operator label and share infrastructure, so the public mesh’s reachability appears to lean on a single operator.

№ 03 Mining Distribution

11 miners produced today's 144 blocks

Kryptex led at 25%. Distribution within normal range.

Kryptex 25%
CUVVE 21.5%
SA100 18.1%
qdlnk 12.5%
taal.com 10.4%
GorillaPool 5.6%
molepool.com 3.5%
KardanPool 0.7%
themule.online 0.7%
taal.com_Teranode 0.7%
Unrecognized 0.7%
Bitofsin 0.7%

Unrecognized coinbase tags: (no readable text) ×1

For the technical reader

Miners are identified by their coinbase tag, a free-text field the block's miner writes into its own coinbase transaction. That miner may be a pool or someone mining solo. The tag is self-reported and unsigned: consensus does not check it, and Teranode reads the same field to name miners. Blocks with no tag, or a tag not on our list, appear as unrecognized. The _Teranode suffix (e.g., taal.com_Teranode) marks blocks whose coinbase tag mentions Teranode, which is also self-reported rather than a formal protocol marker. GorillaPool.io may also be running a Teranode (observed in the Teranode explorer); when blocks become attributable to that node, they would appear with the suffix as well.

Block counts: Kryptex 36, CUVVE 31, SA100 26, qdlnk 18, taal.com 15, GorillaPool 8, molepool.com 5, KardanPool 1, themule.online 1, taal.com_Teranode 1, Unrecognized 1, Bitofsin 1. 143 of 144 blocks identified.

№ 04 Large Transactions

189 transactions of 100 BSV or more

Blocks 971,574–971,717 · 144 blocks, about 24 hours

1 was over 10,000 BSV, a combined ~$420,706. Of the 35,088 BSV in the 4 largest, 34,981 went back to the sending addresses. 5 addresses paid in the largest transactions had not appeared in a 1,000+ BSV transaction since tracking began on March 2.

1
Major
> 10K BSV
~$176,176+
7
Notable
1K – 10K BSV
~$17,618 – 176,176
181
Significant
100 – 1K BSV
~$1,762 – 17,618
Largest transactions
23,879.80BSV
≈ $420,706 2f0db6e692…
1 → 2 Neutral
Seen before1N5CX382LuXA…seen since September 1 in 4 large transactions · received 40 BSV · 23,840 BSV back to the sender
3,926.79BSV
≈ $69,181 60f0f87ab1…
1 → 2 Neutral
Seen before1N5CX382LuXA…seen since September 1 in 4 large transactions · received 40 BSV · 3,887 BSV back to the sender
3,666.63BSV
≈ $64,597 e5dc1917ff…
1 → 2 Neutral
Seen before1N5CX382LuXA…seen since September 1 in 4 large transactions · received 20 BSV · 3,647 BSV back to the sender
3,614.88BSV
≈ $63,686 951c055089…
1 → 2 Neutral
Seen before1H55KA6EWPBq…seen since October 17 in 1 large transaction · received 7.5 BSV · 3,607 BSV back to the sender

Also new since March 2: 1ALPHp4qWKRv… (850 BSV received), 18JU13MAwYpw… (763 BSV received), 1LtZ3bEvvLua… (90 BSV received), and 2 more.

Large holders we follow · 42

None of them ended these blocks 25,000 BSV or more up or down.

How to read this section

Large transactions are transactions in these blocks whose outputs add up to 100 BSV or more. Major > 10K BSV; Notable 1K – 10K BSV; Significant 100 – 1K BSV. The 100-BSV floor excludes ordinary day-to-day payments. A transaction's size includes change returned to the sender, so it is how much value the transaction handled, not how much changed hands. The line under each transaction shows what was actually paid out.

Shape is input-count → output-count. Pattern is heuristic: Neutral is a typical payment (one payment plus change); Consolidation is many inputs to few outputs (UTXO cleanup or sweep); Distribution is few inputs to many outputs (payouts, batch send).

The address under a transaction is its largest output that is not change. An output paid back to one of the transaction's own input addresses counts as change (“back to the sender”). A wallet that sends change to a fresh address can't be told apart this way, so the address shown may still be the sender's. Internal transfer means the sending addresses and every address paid belong to the same holder we follow (below), so the coins likely stayed with one owner.

New address means the address has not appeared, as sender or receiver, in any stored large transaction since tracking began on March 2, 2026. Stored transactions are mostly 1,000 BSV and up; before October 16, 2026 only each day's top 10 were stored. A new address could be a new large holder, an address that only moved smaller amounts before, or a long-dormant address coming back. Seen before gives the first date the address appeared and how many stored transactions it has been in.

Large holders we follow are groups of addresses we treat as one owner, because they have been spent together as inputs or linked by hand from on-chain evidence. For each one, we add up every stored transaction touching its addresses in these blocks: coins received minus coins sent. Moves between a holder's own addresses cancel out, so a large transfer that only shuffles coins internally shows near zero. A holder is listed when it ends the blocks 25,000 BSV or more up or down. Addresses outside these groups are not counted, so a large payment to a new address does not show up here.

All classifications are probabilistic. Grouping addresses into a holder is an inference from on-chain links, not proof of common ownership, and no identity is claimed.

№ 05 Throughput & Market
BSV / USD
$17.62
▼ 1.5% over 24h
Throughput, avg
3tx/s
peak 194 tx/s · 10-min window
Avg tx / block2,186
Max tx / block116,649
Total transactions314,823
10-min peak116,649
For the technical reader

TPS is computed over the 27 hours of the scan window in 10-minute intervals, not per block. The peak is the busiest 10-minute window observed (116,649 transactions, ≈ 194 tx/s for that window).

Price source: real-time quote at scan completion. 24h change is from a rolling 24-hour spot reference.

№ 06 Transaction Velocity

Activity by hour, across 29 hours

314,823 transactions mapped to 10-minute windows. The brightest cell is the busiest window of the day.

0609121518210003060910:00:10:20:30:40:5006:00 UTC — 0 txs06:10 UTC — 0 txs06:20 UTC — 224 txs06:30 UTC — 176 txs06:40 UTC — 18 txs06:50 UTC — 200 txs07:00 UTC — 26 txs07:10 UTC — 111 txs07:20 UTC — 132 txs07:30 UTC — 165 txs07:40 UTC — 124 txs07:50 UTC — 12 txs08:00 UTC — 25 txs08:10 UTC — 18 txs08:20 UTC — 0 txs08:30 UTC — 312 txs08:40 UTC — 20 txs08:50 UTC — 12 txs09:00 UTC — 0 txs09:10 UTC — 0 txs09:20 UTC — 447 txs09:30 UTC — 136 txs09:40 UTC — 0 txs09:50 UTC — 0 txs10:00 UTC — 0 txs10:10 UTC — 677 txs10:20 UTC — 190 txs10:30 UTC — 0 txs10:40 UTC — 0 txs10:50 UTC — 0 txs11:00 UTC — 0 txs11:10 UTC — 431 txs11:20 UTC — 32 txs11:30 UTC — 175 txs11:40 UTC — 0 txs11:50 UTC — 0 txs12:00 UTC — 2,467 txs12:10 UTC — 1,208 txs12:20 UTC — 125 txs12:30 UTC — 206 txs12:40 UTC — 142 txs12:50 UTC — 17 txs13:00 UTC — 28 txs13:10 UTC — 0 txs13:20 UTC — 0 txs13:30 UTC — 0 txs13:40 UTC — 987 txs13:50 UTC — 48 txs14:00 UTC — 142 txs14:10 UTC — 21 txs14:20 UTC — 0 txs14:30 UTC — 555 txs14:40 UTC — 201 txs14:50 UTC — 19 txs15:00 UTC — 0 txs15:10 UTC — 0 txs15:20 UTC — 0 txs15:30 UTC — 2,582 txs15:40 UTC — 42 txs15:50 UTC — 1,866 txs16:00 UTC — 1,432 txs16:10 UTC — 0 txs16:20 UTC — 3,455 txs16:30 UTC — 21 txs16:40 UTC — 9,714 txs16:50 UTC — 3,011 txs17:00 UTC — 0 txs17:10 UTC — 0 txs17:20 UTC — 12,619 txs17:30 UTC — 0 txs17:40 UTC — 0 txs17:50 UTC — 3,889 txs18:00 UTC — 0 txs18:10 UTC — 0 txs18:20 UTC — 5,605 txs18:30 UTC — 5,261 txs18:40 UTC — 7,659 txs18:50 UTC — 9,280 txs19:00 UTC — 0 txs19:10 UTC — 3,930 txs19:20 UTC — 2,785 txs19:30 UTC — 0 txs19:40 UTC — 3,183 txs19:50 UTC — 0 txs20:00 UTC — 17 txs20:10 UTC — 0 txs20:20 UTC — 0 txs20:30 UTC — 0 txs20:40 UTC — 8,879 txs20:50 UTC — 0 txs21:00 UTC — 2,274 txs21:10 UTC — 1,279 txs21:20 UTC — 0 txs21:30 UTC — 0 txs21:40 UTC — 116,649 txs117k21:50 UTC — 6,679 txs22:00 UTC — 5,382 txs22:10 UTC — 0 txs22:20 UTC — 17,986 txs22:30 UTC — 0 txs22:40 UTC — 29 txs22:50 UTC — 0 txs23:00 UTC — 8,359 txs23:10 UTC — 0 txs23:20 UTC — 0 txs23:30 UTC — 7,566 txs23:40 UTC — 0 txs23:50 UTC — 356 txs00:00 UTC — 559 txs00:10 UTC — 0 txs00:20 UTC — 0 txs00:30 UTC — 0 txs00:40 UTC — 5,400 txs00:50 UTC — 0 txs01:00 UTC — 0 txs01:10 UTC — 0 txs01:20 UTC — 8,267 txs01:30 UTC — 1,187 txs01:40 UTC — 1,742 txs01:50 UTC — 0 txs02:00 UTC — 0 txs02:10 UTC — 0 txs02:20 UTC — 47 txs02:30 UTC — 24 txs02:40 UTC — 13 txs02:50 UTC — 0 txs03:00 UTC — 6,267 txs03:10 UTC — 896 txs03:20 UTC — 1,005 txs03:30 UTC — 16 txs03:40 UTC — 1,649 txs03:50 UTC — 0 txs04:00 UTC — 1,582 txs04:10 UTC — 636 txs04:20 UTC — 0 txs04:30 UTC — 0 txs04:40 UTC — 0 txs04:50 UTC — 0 txs05:00 UTC — 3,222 txs05:10 UTC — 1,070 txs05:20 UTC — 471 txs05:30 UTC — 262 txs05:40 UTC — 0 txs05:50 UTC — 0 txs06:00 UTC — 68 txs06:10 UTC — 3,220 txs06:20 UTC — 899 txs06:30 UTC — 23 txs06:40 UTC — 0 txs06:50 UTC — 2,260 txs07:00 UTC — 0 txs07:10 UTC — 0 txs07:20 UTC — 0 txs07:30 UTC — 0 txs07:40 UTC — 112 txs07:50 UTC — 4,623 txs08:00 UTC — 0 txs08:10 UTC — 0 txs08:20 UTC — 1,911 txs08:30 UTC — 1,859 txs08:40 UTC — 18 txs08:50 UTC — 985 txs09:00 UTC — 1,401 txs09:10 UTC — 920 txs09:20 UTC — 591 txs09:30 UTC — 0 txs09:40 UTC — 0 txs09:50 UTC — 0 txs10:00 UTC — 0 txs10:10 UTC — 0 txs10:20 UTC — 0 txs10:30 UTC — 0 txs10:40 UTC — 0 txs10:50 UTC — 0 txsActivity:High
Peak 10-min window: 116,649 txs Coverage: 144 blocks · 27h 10-18 06:24 UTC → 10-19 09:22 UTC
For the technical reader

Dark cells indicate 10-minute windows where no block was mined: a natural result of the Poisson process governing Proof of Work.2 Transactions broadcast during those windows appear in the next mined block.

Each row = one hour of the scan. Each column = a 10-minute bucket within that hour. Read left-to-right within a row, then down to the next hour.

Poisson process. A random event process where events occur independently at a stable average rate, but with unpredictable spacing. Block times have a 10-minute average but individual intervals scatter widely; that's not a bug, it's how the math works.
№ 07 On-chain Activity

0.8 million outputs, by purpose

The TxBlaster service produced 7.0% of transactions, posting paired payment and data-publication outputs continuously. The breakdown below isolates the remaining 93.0% so other activity is readable.

A note on storage. OP_RETURN data is prunable: nodes can discard it without breaking consensus, but reading it back requires running an indexer. UTXO-resident patterns (STAS tokens, spendable metadata, ordinal envelopes) remain in the chain's state and are recoverable from any pruned node. As BSV scales, the architectural direction is toward UTXO-resident data, not OP_RETURN.
All transactions, by source
TxBlaster · 7.0%
93.0%
22,086 tx 292,737 tx · all other
Excluding TxBlaster3 · 761,527 outputs
Payment 62.3% 474,522
P2PKH 474,349 · P2PK 64 · Multisig 109
Data Publication 37.4% 284,802
OP_RETURN 184,388 · Ordinal envelopes 1,315 · Spendable metadata 99,099
Contracts & Tokens 0.29% 2,203
STAS Gen 3: 350 · Custom locking: 1,853 · 17 unique structures

Of 287,005 non-payment outputs in this window, 64.2% were prunable (OP_RETURN) and 35.8% were UTXO-resident. Pruning is permitted by consensus today but not generally practiced — the architectural advantage of UTXO-resident data materializes as throughput scales toward Teranode-class capacity.

Method · how non-payment outputs are embedded
OP_RETURN 184,388Spendable metadata 99,099Ordinal envelope 1,315STAS Gen 3 350Custom locking 1,853
TxBlaster is an identified, automated service that posts paired P2PK + OP_RETURN transactions continuously. We count it separately not because it's less legitimate (every fee-paid valid transaction is real chain activity), but because at 7% of transaction count today, it would visually overwhelm everything else. The numbers above show what the other activity looks like.
For the technical reader

Purpose classifies outputs by what they're locked to:

Payment: P2PKH, P2PK, multisig (spendable value).
Data Publication: OP_RETURN, ordinal envelopes, spendable metadata (carrying data).
Contracts: STAS tokens, custom locking scripts (programmable spend conditions).

Spendable metadata (heuristic): scripts with signature verification followed by data removed via OP_DROP. Metadata isn't consumed by validation logic but remains on-chain in the UTXO set.

Unique structures: a contract structure is a normalized script skeleton with variable data (hashes, signatures, pubkeys) removed. 17 unique structures observed today across 2,203 contract outputs.

№ 08 Protocols & Content

What people published, and how it was framed

Open standards used to format data on-chain, and the MIME types declared in those publications.

Protocol · open standards defining data format
MAP 6,246AIP 3,669B:// 2,568Metanet4 1,4361Sat-Ordinal 1,316BSV-21 1,067STAS 93BAP 4
Metanet (the original). The 2018-2019 nChain protocol: a 4-byte "meta" push in OP_RETURN that defines a DAG of parent-txid-linked records. Not to be confused with the newer BRC-100 "Metanet" wallet/overlay ecosystem, which uses the same word for a different thing.
Content Type · MIME types in declared inscriptions
text/markdown 2,155application/bsv-20 1,067text/plain 219image/webp 115image/jpeg 102application/json 69application/op-ns 51application/octet-stream 50
For the technical reader

Content Types are MIME declarations sourced from two structures: ordinal envelopes (1Sat-style spendable inscriptions) and B:// protocol OP_RETURN publications. Outputs that don't declare a MIME type aren't counted here.

application/bsv-20 covers both BSV-20 and BSV-21: both protocols declare "p":"bsv-20" in their JSON and most inscriptions inherit the legacy MIME type. Protocol differentiation happens via JSON fields (tick = BSV-20 ticker mode; sym/id = BSV-21 tickerless mode).

№ 09 Overlay Directory

155 SHIP endpoints · 148 SLAP endpoints

BRC-88 topic registrations announce who is hosting which overlay services on chain.

SHIP · intake side
155endpoints
across 92 topic managers
SLAP · query side
148endpoints
across 86 lookup services
Top topic managers · SHIP (of 92)
tm_template 18tm_uhrp 16tm_plite 15tm_users 11tm_identity 10
Top lookup services · SLAP (of 86)
ls_template 17ls_uhrp 15ls_identity 10ls_users 10ls_plite 10
Directory topics tm_ship (27) · tm_slap (27) · ls_ship (25) · ls_slap (25)
For the technical reader

BRC-88 SHIP/SLAP. Topic registrations on chain that announce which overlay services a node hosts. SHIP is the intake side: which topic managers (tm_ names) a node accepts transactions for. SLAP is the query side: which lookup services (ls_ names) a node answers queries for.

endpoints = unique (URL, identity key) pairs. advertisements = signed unspent UTXOs on chain, each declaring one endpoint hosts one topic manager or lookup service. Names come in pairs per overlay, e.g. tm_uhrp (advertised via SHIP) and ls_uhrp (advertised via SLAP). SHIP and SLAP are overlays themselves, so ls_ship is a lookup service and is advertised via SLAP, despite the name.

Snapshot from 2026-10-19 11:15 UTC. Counts come from the four trackers hardcoded into the BSV SDK (overlay-us-1, overlay-eu-1, overlay-ap-1, users.bapp.dev). BSV apps query these to find which servers host the overlay topics they need.

№ 10 Identifiable Activity

Applications and tokens with recognizable fingerprints

Teragun led identifiable activity at 116,732 transactions. Most chain activity carries no such identifier; the names below are services whose on-chain shape is recognizable from prior analysis.

Teragun 116,732AIRCHIVE 3,876Twetch 2,622TreeChat 1,742dxs 417Indelible 1963D Ordi 140OYO 82memo.cash 42BSV Live Master 16mintBlue 15MNEE 12BSV Feed/View 3
Application Token Media / NFT
For the technical reader

Patterns are matched against a curated catalog of known protocols and application signatures: MAP tags, B:// envelopes, AIP, OPUB, ordinal mime declarations, custom STAS structures. Some come from WoC tags; others are identified through analysis. New patterns are added editorially as they emerge.

Counts are unique transactions touching each application's recognizable structures. A transaction can match more than one pattern.

№ 11 Script of the Day

Programmable Contract

CONTRACT · selected from 1,853 candidates

Programmable Contract with a 3,150-byte payload

What it does. This script uses conditional logic (OP_IF/OP_ELSE), byte manipulation (OP_SPLIT/OP_CAT), or hash operations to enforce spending conditions beyond simple signature verification.

Why it matters. Demonstrates BSV's full scripting capability for programmable money and stateful applications.

TX 203fcac6be… Block 971,574 3,150 script bytes
Opcodes used (top 16 of 23)
BIN2NUMCATCHECKMULTISIGDIVELSEENDIFFROMALTSTACKGREATERTHANHASH256IFLESSTHANMODMULNOTIFNUM2BINOVER
For the technical reader

Selection is editorial: one script per day from a curated category (Data Carrier, Token Mint, Complex Contract, Hash Puzzle, etc.). Candidate count shows how many similar scripts appeared in the same window.

The script preview above is the actual on-chain ASM (truncated for display); the skeleton normalizes pushes to <DATA> for pattern comparison across transactions. Opcodes shown are the unique ones present in the script, not the sequence order.

Support BSV Intel
Every classification in this brief came from a query I wrote, on infrastructure I built. If it's useful to you, sats keep it shipping.
HandCash $bridget33
BSV address 177bRhNJAioCgMyYCaKTJpauXpgHnUfWnK
Telegram @bsvintel_bot
send /subscribe for daily updates