BSV Intel the signal, daily
Edition 229
Sunday · October 18, 2026
BSV Network · 24 hours ending October 18, 09:23 UTC

Edition 229

Edited by Bridget Doran · Scanned 09:32 UTC, October 18 · Blocks 971,451 → 971,594 · 1,208,325 transactions
Largest transaction
$97K
5,392 BSV · notable tier
Avg block time
9.2min
near schedule
Throughput
15tx/s
peak 1027 tx/s
BSV price
$17.98
▼ 2.2% · 24h
№ 01 Chain Health

11 miners, on schedule

11 miners produced today's 144 blocks at an average interval of 9.2 min — on schedule relative to the 10-minute target.

6.2 min
Median interval
half the blocks faster
61
Fast blocks1
under 5 min
616,080 txs
Busiest block
block 971,506
Fast and slow blocks are an expected feature of Proof of Work, not a defect. Block timing follows a Poisson process (random spacing around a steady average), so clusters of fast or slow blocks happen even when hashrate is unchanged.
Block cadence · 144 blocks · 21.8h
Fast (<5 min) · 61 Normal · 66 Slow (>20 min) · 17
For the technical reader

Block timing. Mean interval 552.4 seconds (9.2 min) over 142 measured intervals across 144 blocks; median 374 seconds (6.2 min). Range 2 s to 2290 s (38.2 min). One sub-3-second interval observed.

Cadence. Average interval 9.2 min — on schedule relative to the 10-minute target. 11 miners produced today's blocks.

Largest block. Block 971,506 at 616,080 transactions, the peak load in the window. Avg tx/block across all 144 blocks was 8,391.

№ 02 Teranode Network

11 Teranode operators visible on the public network

At least 11 operators are announcing on the public gossip network (2 acting as public relays), running versions from v0.0.0-20261013192217-9f5d28108 to v0.16.0. This is the publicly-visible set only; others almost certainly run Teranode without announcing.

11
Visible
announcing on mesh
2
Public relays
accept external tx
11
Caught up → tip
synced to latest block
Versions in use · 11 operators
v0.0.0-20261013192217-9f5d28108 1 · v0.0.0-20261016060925-unknown 1 · v0.0.0-20261017190939-unknown 1 · v0.15.9 1 · v0.16.0-beta-15 2 · v0.16.0 5
For the technical reader

Source: node_status messages on the public BSV gossip layer, observed by our own libp2p listener and deduplicated by peer ID. This counts the publicly-announcing set only — a node that does not broadcast status, or runs inside a private cluster, will not appear, so read it as a floor, not a full census.

“Caught up” means within one block of the chain tip (currently 971,597). Stalled or still-syncing nodes are excluded from that count. “Public relay” here means a node that publicly forwards gossip to the rest of the mesh; only two do, and both announce under the same operator label and share infrastructure, so the public mesh’s reachability appears to lean on a single operator.

№ 03 Mining Distribution

11 miners produced today's 144 blocks

Kryptex led at 24.3%. Distribution within normal range.

Kryptex 24.3%
CUVVE 14.6%
GorillaPool 14.6%
taal.com 9.7%
KardanPool 9.7%
qdlnk 9%
SA100 6.9%
Bitofsin 4.9%
molepool.com 4.2%
taal.com_Teranode 1.4%
themule.online 0.7%
For the technical reader

Miners are identified by their coinbase tag, a free-text field the block's miner writes into its own coinbase transaction. That miner may be a pool or someone mining solo. The tag is self-reported and unsigned: consensus does not check it, and Teranode reads the same field to name miners. Blocks with no tag, or a tag not on our list, appear as unrecognized. The _Teranode suffix (e.g., taal.com_Teranode) marks blocks whose coinbase tag mentions Teranode, which is also self-reported rather than a formal protocol marker. GorillaPool.io may also be running a Teranode (observed in the Teranode explorer); when blocks become attributable to that node, they would appear with the suffix as well.

Block counts: Kryptex 35, CUVVE 21, GorillaPool 21, taal.com 14, KardanPool 14, qdlnk 13, SA100 10, Bitofsin 7, molepool.com 6, taal.com_Teranode 2, themule.online 1. 144 of 144 blocks identified.

№ 04 Large Transactions

96 transactions of 100 BSV or more

Blocks 971,451–971,594 · 144 blocks, about 24 hours

None was over 10,000 BSV. Of the 9,636 BSV in the 4 largest, 4,958 went back to the sending addresses. 9 addresses paid in the largest transactions had not appeared in a 1,000+ BSV transaction since tracking began on March 2.

0
Major
> 10K BSV
~$179,776+
4
Notable
1K – 10K BSV
~$17,978 – 179,776
92
Significant
100 – 1K BSV
~$1,798 – 17,978
Largest transactions
5,392.02BSV
≈ $96,936 a7e0fb0bb2…
1 → 2 Neutral
New address1G8hZwcQLXBj…received 450 BSV · 4,942 BSV back to the sender
1,664.69BSV
≈ $29,927 3209c02674…
9 → 1 Consolidation
New address1H1fbGo5XQZU…received 1,665 BSV
1,562.52BSV
≈ $28,090 1bdc2e58e4…
34 → 1 Consolidation
Seen before1G47mSr3oANX…seen since March 4 in 468 large transactions · received 1,563 BSV
1,016.36BSV
≈ $18,272 77bce8d667…
2 → 2 Neutral
Seen before1Av1xMeWnHe6…seen since April 17 in 8 large transactions · received 1,000 BSV · 16.36 BSV back to the sender

Also new since March 2: 1D3zU8DzF69v… (911 BSV received), 1Bt7cRzUukJy… (190 BSV received), 1MUXa1mYyFby… (100 BSV received), and 4 more.

Large holders we follow · 41

None of them ended these blocks 25,000 BSV or more up or down.

How to read this section

Large transactions are transactions in these blocks whose outputs add up to 100 BSV or more. Major > 10K BSV; Notable 1K – 10K BSV; Significant 100 – 1K BSV. The 100-BSV floor excludes ordinary day-to-day payments. A transaction's size includes change returned to the sender, so it is how much value the transaction handled, not how much changed hands. The line under each transaction shows what was actually paid out.

Shape is input-count → output-count. Pattern is heuristic: Neutral is a typical payment (one payment plus change); Consolidation is many inputs to few outputs (UTXO cleanup or sweep); Distribution is few inputs to many outputs (payouts, batch send).

The address under a transaction is its largest output that is not change. An output paid back to one of the transaction's own input addresses counts as change (“back to the sender”). A wallet that sends change to a fresh address can't be told apart this way, so the address shown may still be the sender's. Internal transfer means the sending addresses and every address paid belong to the same holder we follow (below), so the coins likely stayed with one owner.

New address means the address has not appeared, as sender or receiver, in any stored large transaction since tracking began on March 2, 2026. Stored transactions are mostly 1,000 BSV and up; before October 16, 2026 only each day's top 10 were stored. A new address could be a new large holder, an address that only moved smaller amounts before, or a long-dormant address coming back. Seen before gives the first date the address appeared and how many stored transactions it has been in.

Large holders we follow are groups of addresses we treat as one owner, because they have been spent together as inputs or linked by hand from on-chain evidence. For each one, we add up every stored transaction touching its addresses in these blocks: coins received minus coins sent. Moves between a holder's own addresses cancel out, so a large transfer that only shuffles coins internally shows near zero. A holder is listed when it ends the blocks 25,000 BSV or more up or down. Addresses outside these groups are not counted, so a large payment to a new address does not show up here.

All classifications are probabilistic. Grouping addresses into a holder is an inference from on-chain links, not proof of common ownership, and no identity is claimed.

№ 05 Throughput & Market
BSV / USD
$17.98
▼ 2.2% over 24h
Throughput, avg
15tx/s
peak 1027 tx/s · 10-min window
Avg tx / block8,391
Max tx / block616,080
Total transactions1,208,325
10-min peak616,098
For the technical reader

TPS is computed over the 21.8 hours of the scan window in 10-minute intervals, not per block. The peak is the busiest 10-minute window observed (616,098 transactions, ≈ 1027 tx/s for that window).

Price source: real-time quote at scan completion. 24h change is from a rolling 24-hour spot reference.

№ 06 Transaction Velocity

Activity by hour, across 24 hours

1,208,325 transactions mapped to 10-minute windows. The brightest cell is the busiest window of the day.

111417202302050810:00:10:20:30:40:5011:00 UTC — 0 txs11:10 UTC — 0 txs11:20 UTC — 0 txs11:30 UTC — 1,835 txs11:40 UTC — 0 txs11:50 UTC — 410 txs12:00 UTC — 0 txs12:10 UTC — 441 txs12:20 UTC — 0 txs12:30 UTC — 0 txs12:40 UTC — 0 txs12:50 UTC — 706 txs13:00 UTC — 0 txs13:10 UTC — 360 txs13:20 UTC — 29 txs13:30 UTC — 346 txs13:40 UTC — 0 txs13:50 UTC — 1,472 txs14:00 UTC — 34,507 txs14:10 UTC — 48 txs14:20 UTC — 255,771 txs256k14:30 UTC — 83,812 txs14:40 UTC — 126,504 txs14:50 UTC — 534 txs15:00 UTC — 166 txs15:10 UTC — 8 txs15:20 UTC — 385 txs15:30 UTC — 0 txs15:40 UTC — 307 txs15:50 UTC — 0 txs16:00 UTC — 2,187 txs16:10 UTC — 390 txs16:20 UTC — 17 txs16:30 UTC — 0 txs16:40 UTC — 0 txs16:50 UTC — 823 txs17:00 UTC — 179 txs17:10 UTC — 210 txs17:20 UTC — 121 txs17:30 UTC — 361 txs17:40 UTC — 74 txs17:50 UTC — 33 txs18:00 UTC — 15 txs18:10 UTC — 726 txs18:20 UTC — 0 txs18:30 UTC — 2,233 txs18:40 UTC — 10,192 txs18:50 UTC — 0 txs19:00 UTC — 616,098 txs616k19:10 UTC — 11 txs19:20 UTC — 1,173 txs19:30 UTC — 201 txs19:40 UTC — 219 txs19:50 UTC — 167 txs20:00 UTC — 0 txs20:10 UTC — 581 txs20:20 UTC — 163 txs20:30 UTC — 0 txs20:40 UTC — 0 txs20:50 UTC — 485 txs21:00 UTC — 223 txs21:10 UTC — 247 txs21:20 UTC — 0 txs21:30 UTC — 0 txs21:40 UTC — 403 txs21:50 UTC — 782 txs22:00 UTC — 1,754 txs22:10 UTC — 452 txs22:20 UTC — 0 txs22:30 UTC — 43 txs22:40 UTC — 4 txs22:50 UTC — 3,540 txs23:00 UTC — 115 txs23:10 UTC — 30,849 txs23:20 UTC — 14,389 txs23:30 UTC — 0 txs23:40 UTC — 0 txs23:50 UTC — 702 txs00:00 UTC — 1,168 txs00:10 UTC — 13 txs00:20 UTC — 0 txs00:30 UTC — 0 txs00:40 UTC — 74 txs00:50 UTC — 3,594 txs01:00 UTC — 170 txs01:10 UTC — 0 txs01:20 UTC — 0 txs01:30 UTC — 378 txs01:40 UTC — 0 txs01:50 UTC — 288 txs02:00 UTC — 457 txs02:10 UTC — 12 txs02:20 UTC — 118 txs02:30 UTC — 0 txs02:40 UTC — 0 txs02:50 UTC — 0 txs03:00 UTC — 395 txs03:10 UTC — 0 txs03:20 UTC — 234 txs03:30 UTC — 0 txs03:40 UTC — 177 txs03:50 UTC — 64 txs04:00 UTC — 0 txs04:10 UTC — 171 txs04:20 UTC — 106 txs04:30 UTC — 0 txs04:40 UTC — 0 txs04:50 UTC — 352 txs05:00 UTC — 189 txs05:10 UTC — 0 txs05:20 UTC — 0 txs05:30 UTC — 0 txs05:40 UTC — 412 txs05:50 UTC — 128 txs06:00 UTC — 0 txs06:10 UTC — 0 txs06:20 UTC — 224 txs06:30 UTC — 176 txs06:40 UTC — 18 txs06:50 UTC — 200 txs07:00 UTC — 26 txs07:10 UTC — 111 txs07:20 UTC — 132 txs07:30 UTC — 165 txs07:40 UTC — 124 txs07:50 UTC — 12 txs08:00 UTC — 25 txs08:10 UTC — 18 txs08:20 UTC — 0 txs08:30 UTC — 312 txs08:40 UTC — 20 txs08:50 UTC — 12 txs09:00 UTC — 0 txs09:10 UTC — 0 txs09:20 UTC — 447 txs09:30 UTC — 0 txs09:40 UTC — 0 txs09:50 UTC — 0 txs10:00 UTC — 0 txs10:10 UTC — 0 txs10:20 UTC — 0 txs10:30 UTC — 0 txs10:40 UTC — 0 txs10:50 UTC — 0 txsActivity:High
Peak 10-min window: 616,098 txs Coverage: 144 blocks · 21.8h 10-17 11:37 UTC → 10-18 09:23 UTC
For the technical reader

Dark cells indicate 10-minute windows where no block was mined: a natural result of the Poisson process governing Proof of Work.2 Transactions broadcast during those windows appear in the next mined block.

Each row = one hour of the scan. Each column = a 10-minute bucket within that hour. Read left-to-right within a row, then down to the next hour.

Poisson process. A random event process where events occur independently at a stable average rate, but with unpredictable spacing. Block times have a 10-minute average but individual intervals scatter widely; that's not a bug, it's how the math works.
№ 07 On-chain Activity

2.5 million outputs, by purpose

The TxBlaster service produced 41.4% of transactions, posting paired payment and data-publication outputs continuously. The breakdown below isolates the remaining 58.6% so other activity is readable.

A note on storage. OP_RETURN data is prunable: nodes can discard it without breaking consensus, but reading it back requires running an indexer. UTXO-resident patterns (STAS tokens, spendable metadata, ordinal envelopes) remain in the chain's state and are recoverable from any pruned node. As BSV scales, the architectural direction is toward UTXO-resident data, not OP_RETURN.
All transactions, by source
TxBlaster · 41.4%
58.6%
500,000 tx 708,325 tx · all other
Excluding TxBlaster3 · 1,516,593 outputs
Payment 56.5% 857,306
P2PKH 852,250 · P2PK 5,001 · Multisig 55
Data Publication 43.3% 656,427
OP_RETURN 647,592 · Ordinal envelopes 3,861 · Spendable metadata 4,974
Contracts & Tokens 0.19% 2,860
STAS Gen 3: 470 · Custom locking: 2,390 · 16 unique structures

Of 659,287 non-payment outputs in this window, 98.2% were prunable (OP_RETURN) and 1.8% were UTXO-resident. Pruning is permitted by consensus today but not generally practiced — the architectural advantage of UTXO-resident data materializes as throughput scales toward Teranode-class capacity.

Method · how non-payment outputs are embedded
OP_RETURN 647,592Spendable metadata 4,974Ordinal envelope 3,861STAS Gen 3 470Custom locking 2,390
TxBlaster is an identified, automated service that posts paired P2PK + OP_RETURN transactions continuously. We count it separately not because it's less legitimate (every fee-paid valid transaction is real chain activity), but because at 41% of transaction count today, it would visually overwhelm everything else. The numbers above show what the other activity looks like.
For the technical reader

Purpose classifies outputs by what they're locked to:

Payment: P2PKH, P2PK, multisig (spendable value).
Data Publication: OP_RETURN, ordinal envelopes, spendable metadata (carrying data).
Contracts: STAS tokens, custom locking scripts (programmable spend conditions).

Spendable metadata (heuristic): scripts with signature verification followed by data removed via OP_DROP. Metadata isn't consumed by validation logic but remains on-chain in the UTXO set.

Unique structures: a contract structure is a normalized script skeleton with variable data (hashes, signatures, pubkeys) removed. 16 unique structures observed today across 2,860 contract outputs.

№ 08 Protocols & Content

What people published, and how it was framed

Open standards used to format data on-chain, and the MIME types declared in those publications.

Protocol · open standards defining data format
MAP 8,2211Sat-Ordinal 3,861AIP 2,708B:// 1,842BSV-21 1,379Metanet4 722STAS 20BAP 6
Metanet (the original). The 2018-2019 nChain protocol: a 4-byte "meta" push in OP_RETURN that defines a DAG of parent-txid-linked records. Not to be confused with the newer BRC-100 "Metanet" wallet/overlay ecosystem, which uses the same word for a different thing.
Content Type · MIME types in declared inscriptions
image/svg+xml 2,180text/markdown 1,484application/bsv-20 1,378application/octet-stream 145text/plain 143image/webp 118image/jpeg 96application/json 59
For the technical reader

Content Types are MIME declarations sourced from two structures: ordinal envelopes (1Sat-style spendable inscriptions) and B:// protocol OP_RETURN publications. Outputs that don't declare a MIME type aren't counted here.

application/bsv-20 covers both BSV-20 and BSV-21: both protocols declare "p":"bsv-20" in their JSON and most inscriptions inherit the legacy MIME type. Protocol differentiation happens via JSON fields (tick = BSV-20 ticker mode; sym/id = BSV-21 tickerless mode).

№ 09 Overlay Directory

303 endpoints across the federation, 2 new this window

BRC-88 topic registrations announce who is hosting which overlay services on chain.

SHIP · intake side
155endpoints
across 92 topic managers
SLAP · query side
148endpoints
across 86 lookup services
Top topic managers · SHIP (of 92)
tm_template 18tm_uhrp 16tm_plite 15tm_users 11tm_identity 10
Top lookup services · SLAP (of 86)
ls_template 17ls_uhrp 15ls_identity 10ls_users 10ls_plite 10
Directory topics tm_ship (27) · tm_slap (27) · ls_ship (25) · ls_slap (25)
New this window · 2 advertisements
SHIP
tm_pf_number_head_beta
operator 02f51189b32b3de5… · rust-beta.overlay.zanaadu.com
971,499
SLAP
ls_pf_number_head_beta
operator 02f51189b32b3de5… · rust-beta.overlay.zanaadu.com
971,499
For the technical reader

BRC-88 SHIP/SLAP. Topic registrations on chain that announce which overlay services a node hosts. SHIP is the intake side: which topic managers (tm_ names) a node accepts transactions for. SLAP is the query side: which lookup services (ls_ names) a node answers queries for.

endpoints = unique (URL, identity key) pairs. advertisements = signed unspent UTXOs on chain, each declaring one endpoint hosts one topic manager or lookup service. Names come in pairs per overlay, e.g. tm_uhrp (advertised via SHIP) and ls_uhrp (advertised via SLAP). SHIP and SLAP are overlays themselves, so ls_ship is a lookup service and is advertised via SLAP, despite the name.

Snapshot from 2026-10-18 11:15 UTC. Counts come from the four trackers hardcoded into the BSV SDK (overlay-us-1, overlay-eu-1, overlay-ap-1, users.bapp.dev). BSV apps query these to find which servers host the overlay topics they need.

№ 10 Identifiable Activity

Applications and tokens with recognizable fingerprints

AIRCHIVE led identifiable activity at 3,286 transactions. Most chain activity carries no such identifier; the names below are services whose on-chain shape is recognizable from prior analysis.

AIRCHIVE 3,286Twetch 2,157TreeChat 1,192Indelible 533dxs 466OYO 1653D Ordi 97memo.cash 34BSV Live Master 31mintBlue 10BSV Feed/View 3
Application Token Media / NFT
For the technical reader

Patterns are matched against a curated catalog of known protocols and application signatures: MAP tags, B:// envelopes, AIP, OPUB, ordinal mime declarations, custom STAS structures. Some come from WoC tags; others are identified through analysis. New patterns are added editorially as they emerge.

Counts are unique transactions touching each application's recognizable structures. A transaction can match more than one pattern.

№ 11 Script of the Day

Ordinal Inscription

ORDINAL · selected from 3,861 candidates

Ordinal Inscription with a 4,377-byte payload

What it does. This script embeds data inside a conditional branch. The OP_FALSE OP_IF block carries the payload (marked "ord"), while the P2PKH suffix enforces signature-based ownership.

Why it matters. Encodes ownership into individual satoshis. Transferable by spending the UTXO.

TX bc5fcbefbe… Block 971,451 4,377 script bytes
Opcodes used
0IF1ENDIFDUPHASH160EQUALVERIFYCHECKSIG
Script preview
OP_0 OP_IF 6f7264 OP_1 6170706c69636174696f6e2f6a736f6e OP_0 7b2267656e223a2239376433373464633563396262386162663233393766393664373330306233346261616633373462613732636535323934363330343263333632343735303832222c2276223a322c2273223a226a756e676c6543616e6f7079222c2268223a3937313335302c226268223a223030303
Skeleton
OP_0 OP_IF 6f7264 OP_1 <DATA> OP_0 <DATA> OP_ENDIF OP_DUP OP_HASH160 <DATA> OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG
For the technical reader

Selection is editorial: one script per day from a curated category (Data Carrier, Token Mint, Complex Contract, Hash Puzzle, etc.). Candidate count shows how many similar scripts appeared in the same window.

The script preview above is the actual on-chain ASM (truncated for display); the skeleton normalizes pushes to <DATA> for pattern comparison across transactions. Opcodes shown are the unique ones present in the script, not the sequence order.

Support BSV Intel
Every classification in this brief came from a query I wrote, on infrastructure I built. If it's useful to you, sats keep it shipping.
HandCash $bridget33
BSV address 177bRhNJAioCgMyYCaKTJpauXpgHnUfWnK
Telegram @bsvintel_bot
send /subscribe for daily updates