BSV Intel the signal, daily
Edition 225
Wednesday · October 14, 2026
BSV Network · 24 hours ending October 14, 09:27 UTC

Edition 225

Edited by Bridget Doran · Scanned 09:32 UTC, October 14 · Blocks 970,886 → 971,029 · 1,358,566 transactions
Largest move
$1.36M
73,632 BSV · whale tier
Avg block time
7.7min
off schedule
Throughput
21tx/s
peak 552 tx/s
BSV price
$18.42
▼ 1.2% · 24h
№ 01 Chain Health

12 miners, running fast

12 miners produced today's 144 blocks at an average interval of 7.7 min — running fast relative to the 10-minute target.

5.1 min
Median interval
half the blocks faster
71
Fast blocks1
under 5 min
331,000 txs
Busiest block
block 970,962
Fast and slow blocks are an expected feature of Proof of Work, not a defect. Block timing follows a Poisson process (random spacing around a steady average), so clusters of fast or slow blocks happen even when hashrate is unchanged.
Block cadence · 144 blocks · 18.3h
Fast (<5 min) · 71 Normal · 63 Slow (>20 min) · 10
For the technical reader

Block timing. Mean interval 460.4 seconds (7.7 min) over 143 measured intervals across 144 blocks; median 303 seconds (5.1 min). Range 4 s to 2762 s (46.0 min).

Cadence. Average interval 7.7 min — running fast relative to the 10-minute target. 12 miners produced today's blocks.

Largest block. Block 970,962 at 331,000 transactions, the peak load in the window. Avg tx/block across all 144 blocks was 9,434.

№ 02 Teranode Network

10 Teranode operators visible on the public network

At least 10 operators are announcing on the public gossip network (2 acting as public relays), running versions from v0.0.0-20261013131745-unknown to v0.16.0. This is the publicly-visible set only; others almost certainly run Teranode without announcing.

10
Visible
announcing on mesh
2
Public relays
accept external tx
8
Caught up → tip
synced to latest block
Versions in use · 10 operators
v0.0.0-20261013131745-unknown 1 · v0.0.0-20261013192217-9f5d28108 1 · v0.15.9 4 · v0.16.0-beta-15 2 · v0.16.0 2
For the technical reader

Source: node_status messages on the public BSV gossip layer, observed by our own libp2p listener and deduplicated by peer ID. This counts the publicly-announcing set only — a node that does not broadcast status, or runs inside a private cluster, will not appear, so read it as a floor, not a full census.

“Caught up” means within one block of the chain tip (currently 971,045). Stalled or still-syncing nodes are excluded from that count. “Public relay” here means a node that publicly forwards gossip to the rest of the mesh; only two do, and both announce under the same operator label and share infrastructure, so the public mesh’s reachability appears to lean on a single operator.

№ 03 Mining Distribution

12 miners produced today's 144 blocks

Kryptex led at 28.5%. Distribution within normal range.

Kryptex 28.5%
SA100 13.9%
CUVVE 12.5%
taal.com 11.1%
qdlnk 11.1%
Bitofsin 7.6%
GorillaPool 5.6%
molepool.com 3.5%
KardanPool 2.1%
themule.online 1.4%
Unrecognized 1.4%
taal.com_Teranode 0.7%
hash-hut.net 0.7%

Unrecognized coinbase tags: /public-pool-btc.ru/ ×2

For the technical reader

Miners are identified by their coinbase tag, a free-text field the block's miner writes into its own coinbase transaction. That miner may be a pool or someone mining solo. The tag is self-reported and unsigned: consensus does not check it, and Teranode reads the same field to name miners. Blocks with no tag, or a tag not on our list, appear as unrecognized. The _Teranode suffix (e.g., taal.com_Teranode) marks blocks whose coinbase tag mentions Teranode, which is also self-reported rather than a formal protocol marker. GorillaPool.io may also be running a Teranode (observed in the Teranode explorer); when blocks become attributable to that node, they would appear with the suffix as well.

Block counts: Kryptex 41, SA100 20, CUVVE 18, taal.com 16, qdlnk 16, Bitofsin 11, GorillaPool 8, molepool.com 5, KardanPool 3, themule.online 2, Unrecognized 2, taal.com_Teranode 1, hash-hut.net 1. 142 of 144 blocks identified.

№ 04 Capital Flow

210 movements crossed the chain

3 of them moved more than 10,000 BSV, a combined ~$2.3 million at today's price.

3
Major
> 10K BSV
~$184,242+
8
Notable
1K – 10K BSV
~$18,424 – 184,242
199
Significant
100 – 1K BSV
~$1,842 – 18,424
Top movements
73,632.34BSV
≈ $1,356,615 ab4990116d…
2 → 2 Neutral
27,355.18BSV
≈ $503,996 b87622a60d…
1 → 5 Distribution
25,429.85BSV
≈ $468,524 1c9731f319…
1 → 2 Neutral
8,862.99BSV
≈ $163,293 0289de0086…
4 → 2 Neutral
For the technical reader

Tier thresholds. Major > 10K BSV; Notable 1K – 10K BSV; Significant 100 – 1K BSV. Counts are unique transactions in the 24-hour window moving value within these bands; the 100-BSV floor excludes ordinary day-to-day payments.

Shape is input-count → output-count. Pattern is heuristic:

Neutral: typical payment shape (1→2 or 2→2, one payment + change).
Consolidation: many inputs, few outputs (UTXO cleanup or sweep).
Distribution: few inputs, many outputs (payouts, faucet, batch send).

№ 05 Address Intelligence

70 tracked addresses across 227 days

20 new addresses on the radar today. (what does this mean?)

New to the radar
1LVPM13Q83vXiCxKsL… 73,632 BSV First appearance
16eUJYWSanBfrytT7p… 27,355 BSV First appearance
13VkN8wSBDb75kTE4V… 27,355 BSV First appearance
Recurring addresses
Address Behavior Confidence Active
9,251,385 BSV · 461 txs
Exchange-Like High 03-04 → 10-14
6,799,301 BSV · 243 txs
Exchange-Like High 03-02 → 10-14
3,881,685 BSV · 162 txs
Exchange-Like High 03-02 → 10-12
1,596,861 BSV · 130 txs
Exchange-Like High 03-02 → 10-14
19,478,324 BSV · 126 txs
Exchange-Like High 03-08 → 10-14
How to read this

New to the radar flags addresses from today's top whale movements that have not appeared in any whale-tier transaction during the observation window. This could indicate a new large holder, a previously sub-threshold address crossing into whale territory, or a long-dormant address reactivating.

Recurring addresses are identified by tracking output scripts across all whale transactions (≥ 100 BSV) over the full 227-day observation window. An address appearing here has been involved in large-value movements on multiple separate days.

Behavior is based on whether an address predominantly receives (Accumulator), predominantly sends (Distributor), or does both in roughly equal measure (Exchange-Like).

Confidence reflects how many indicators align: transaction frequency, directional balance, and tier presence. High = 3+ indicators; Medium = 2; Low = 1.

All classifications are probabilistic. No identity or ownership claims are made. Addresses are derived from transaction output scripts.

№ 06 Throughput & Market
BSV / USD
$18.42
▼ 1.2% over 24h
Throughput, avg
21tx/s
peak 552 tx/s · 10-min window
Avg tx / block9,434
Max tx / block331,000
Total transactions1,358,566
10-min peak331,000
For the technical reader

TPS is computed over the 18.3 hours of the scan window in 10-minute intervals, not per block. The peak is the busiest 10-minute window observed (331,000 transactions, ≈ 552 tx/s for that window).

Price source: real-time quote at scan completion. 24h change is from a rolling 24-hour spot reference.

№ 07 Transaction Velocity

Activity by hour, across 20 hours

1,358,566 transactions mapped to 10-minute windows. The brightest cell is the busiest window of the day.

1518210003060910:00:10:20:30:40:5015:00 UTC — 0 txs15:10 UTC — 2,334 txs15:20 UTC — 0 txs15:30 UTC — 0 txs15:40 UTC — 0 txs15:50 UTC — 3,084 txs16:00 UTC — 0 txs16:10 UTC — 691 txs16:20 UTC — 0 txs16:30 UTC — 2,669 txs16:40 UTC — 28 txs16:50 UTC — 2,152 txs17:00 UTC — 440 txs17:10 UTC — 0 txs17:20 UTC — 2,861 txs17:30 UTC — 27 txs17:40 UTC — 2,246 txs17:50 UTC — 713 txs18:00 UTC — 0 txs18:10 UTC — 49 txs18:20 UTC — 3,182 txs18:30 UTC — 129 txs18:40 UTC — 1,655 txs18:50 UTC — 1,226 txs19:00 UTC — 1,312 txs19:10 UTC — 32 txs19:20 UTC — 0 txs19:30 UTC — 2,979 txs19:40 UTC — 750 txs19:50 UTC — 1,344 txs20:00 UTC — 0 txs20:10 UTC — 0 txs20:20 UTC — 2,944 txs20:30 UTC — 0 txs20:40 UTC — 48 txs20:50 UTC — 2,414 txs21:00 UTC — 0 txs21:10 UTC — 53 txs21:20 UTC — 17 txs21:30 UTC — 8,343 txs21:40 UTC — 2,027 txs21:50 UTC — 39 txs22:00 UTC — 45 txs22:10 UTC — 11,257 txs22:20 UTC — 0 txs22:30 UTC — 14 txs22:40 UTC — 27,956 txs22:50 UTC — 901 txs23:00 UTC — 0 txs23:10 UTC — 8,718 txs23:20 UTC — 23 txs23:30 UTC — 0 txs23:40 UTC — 0 txs23:50 UTC — 26,161 txs00:00 UTC — 1,124 txs00:10 UTC — 18 txs00:20 UTC — 6,978 txs00:30 UTC — 0 txs00:40 UTC — 6,167 txs00:50 UTC — 331,000 txs331k01:00 UTC — 0 txs01:10 UTC — 0 txs01:20 UTC — 7,621 txs01:30 UTC — 22 txs01:40 UTC — 24 txs01:50 UTC — 6,948 txs02:00 UTC — 0 txs02:10 UTC — 35 txs02:20 UTC — 0 txs02:30 UTC — 13,096 txs02:40 UTC — 2,159 txs02:50 UTC — 2,871 txs03:00 UTC — 5,514 txs03:10 UTC — 1,748 txs03:20 UTC — 4,479 txs03:30 UTC — 0 txs03:40 UTC — 0 txs03:50 UTC — 7,380 txs04:00 UTC — 4,627 txs04:10 UTC — 2,604 txs04:20 UTC — 22 txs04:30 UTC — 5,799 txs04:40 UTC — 2,361 txs04:50 UTC — 3,643 txs05:00 UTC — 643 txs05:10 UTC — 2,156 txs05:20 UTC — 0 txs05:30 UTC — 2,812 txs05:40 UTC — 0 txs05:50 UTC — 4,355 txs06:00 UTC — 1,820 txs06:10 UTC — 2,207 txs06:20 UTC — 5,056 txs06:30 UTC — 0 txs06:40 UTC — 37 txs06:50 UTC — 2,149 txs07:00 UTC — 1,098 txs07:10 UTC — 0 txs07:20 UTC — 0 txs07:30 UTC — 1,708 txs07:40 UTC — 0 txs07:50 UTC — 126,849 txs08:00 UTC — 0 txs08:10 UTC — 242,673 txs243k08:20 UTC — 156,807 txs157k08:30 UTC — 0 txs08:40 UTC — 0 txs08:50 UTC — 243,154 txs243k09:00 UTC — 9 txs09:10 UTC — 18,845 txs09:20 UTC — 9,085 txs09:30 UTC — 0 txs09:40 UTC — 0 txs09:50 UTC — 0 txs10:00 UTC — 0 txs10:10 UTC — 0 txs10:20 UTC — 0 txs10:30 UTC — 0 txs10:40 UTC — 0 txs10:50 UTC — 0 txsActivity:High
Peak 10-min window: 331,000 txs Coverage: 144 blocks · 18.3h 10-13 15:10 UTC → 10-14 09:27 UTC
For the technical reader

Dark cells indicate 10-minute windows where no block was mined: a natural result of the Poisson process governing Proof of Work.2 Transactions broadcast during those windows appear in the next mined block.

Each row = one hour of the scan. Each column = a 10-minute bucket within that hour. Read left-to-right within a row, then down to the next hour.

Poisson process. A random event process where events occur independently at a stable average rate, but with unpredictable spacing. Block times have a 10-minute average but individual intervals scatter widely; that's not a bug, it's how the math works.
№ 08 On-chain Activity

1.7 million outputs, by purpose

The TxBlaster service produced 1.3% of transactions, posting paired payment and data-publication outputs continuously. The breakdown below isolates the remaining 98.7% so other activity is readable.

A note on storage. OP_RETURN data is prunable: nodes can discard it without breaking consensus, but reading it back requires running an indexer. UTXO-resident patterns (STAS tokens, spendable metadata, ordinal envelopes) remain in the chain's state and are recoverable from any pruned node. As BSV scales, the architectural direction is toward UTXO-resident data, not OP_RETURN.
All transactions, by source
TxBlaster · 1.3%
98.7%
17,857 tx 1,340,709 tx · all other
Excluding TxBlaster3 · 1,622,259 outputs
Payment 86.0% 1,395,245
P2PKH 1,393,662 · P2PK 1,525 · Multisig 58
Data Publication 9.1% 147,531
OP_RETURN 134,382 · Ordinal envelopes 13,074 · Spendable metadata 75
Contracts & Tokens 4.90% 79,483
STAS Gen 3: 1,023 · Custom locking: 78,460 · 12 unique structures

Of 227,014 non-payment outputs in this window, 59.2% were prunable (OP_RETURN) and 40.8% were UTXO-resident. Pruning is permitted by consensus today but not generally practiced — the architectural advantage of UTXO-resident data materializes as throughput scales toward Teranode-class capacity.

Method · how non-payment outputs are embedded
OP_RETURN 134,382Spendable metadata 75Ordinal envelope 13,074STAS Gen 3 1,023Custom locking 78,460
TxBlaster is an identified, automated service that posts paired P2PK + OP_RETURN transactions continuously. We count it separately not because it's less legitimate (every fee-paid valid transaction is real chain activity), but because at 1% of transaction count today, it would visually overwhelm everything else. The numbers above show what the other activity looks like.
For the technical reader

Purpose classifies outputs by what they're locked to:

Payment: P2PKH, P2PK, multisig (spendable value).
Data Publication: OP_RETURN, ordinal envelopes, spendable metadata (carrying data).
Contracts: STAS tokens, custom locking scripts (programmable spend conditions).

Spendable metadata (heuristic): scripts with signature verification followed by data removed via OP_DROP. Metadata isn't consumed by validation logic but remains on-chain in the UTXO set.

Unique structures: a contract structure is a normalized script skeleton with variable data (hashes, signatures, pubkeys) removed. 12 unique structures observed today across 79,483 contract outputs.

№ 09 Protocols & Content

What people published, and how it was framed

Open standards used to format data on-chain, and the MIME types declared in those publications.

Protocol · open standards defining data format
1Sat-Ordinal 13,078MAP 4,826AIP 3,240BSV-21 2,509B:// 2,050Metanet4 1,630STAS 253BAP 3
Metanet (the original). The 2018-2019 nChain protocol: a 4-byte "meta" push in OP_RETURN that defines a DAG of parent-txid-linked records. Not to be confused with the newer BRC-100 "Metanet" wallet/overlay ecosystem, which uses the same word for a different thing.
Content Type · MIME types in declared inscriptions
application/op-ns 10,464application/bsv-20 2,509text/markdown 1,699image/webp 135text/plain 110image/jpeg 81text/html 43application/json 40
For the technical reader

Content Types are MIME declarations sourced from two structures: ordinal envelopes (1Sat-style spendable inscriptions) and B:// protocol OP_RETURN publications. Outputs that don't declare a MIME type aren't counted here.

application/bsv-20 covers both BSV-20 and BSV-21: both protocols declare "p":"bsv-20" in their JSON and most inscriptions inherit the legacy MIME type. Protocol differentiation happens via JSON fields (tick = BSV-20 ticker mode; sym/id = BSV-21 tickerless mode).

№ 10 Overlay Directory

299 endpoints across the federation, 6 new this window

BRC-88 topic registrations announce who is hosting which overlay services on chain.

SHIP · intake side
153endpoints
across 91 topic managers
SLAP · query side
146endpoints
across 85 lookup services
Top topic managers · SHIP (of 91)
tm_template 18tm_plite 15tm_uhrp 14tm_users 11tm_identity 10
Top lookup services · SLAP (of 85)
ls_template 17ls_uhrp 13ls_identity 10ls_users 10ls_plite 10
Directory topics tm_ship (27) · tm_slap (27) · ls_ship (25) · ls_slap (25)
New this window · 6 advertisements
SHIP
tm_pf_picture_head_beta
operator 02f51189b32b3de5… · rust-beta.overlay.zanaadu.com
970,982
SHIP
tm_pf_content_beta
operator 02f51189b32b3de5… · rust-beta.overlay.zanaadu.com
970,982
SHIP
tm_pf_name_beta
operator 02f51189b32b3de5… · rust-beta.overlay.zanaadu.com
970,982
SLAP
ls_pf_name_beta
operator 02f51189b32b3de5… · rust-beta.overlay.zanaadu.com
970,982
SLAP
ls_pf_content_beta
operator 02f51189b32b3de5… · rust-beta.overlay.zanaadu.com
970,982
SLAP
ls_pf_picture_head_beta
operator 02f51189b32b3de5… · rust-beta.overlay.zanaadu.com
970,982
For the technical reader

BRC-88 SHIP/SLAP. Topic registrations on chain that announce which overlay services a node hosts. SHIP is the intake side: which topic managers (tm_ names) a node accepts transactions for. SLAP is the query side: which lookup services (ls_ names) a node answers queries for.

endpoints = unique (URL, identity key) pairs. advertisements = signed unspent UTXOs on chain, each declaring one endpoint hosts one topic manager or lookup service. Names come in pairs per overlay, e.g. tm_uhrp (advertised via SHIP) and ls_uhrp (advertised via SLAP). SHIP and SLAP are overlays themselves, so ls_ship is a lookup service and is advertised via SLAP, despite the name.

Snapshot from 2026-10-14 11:16 UTC. Counts come from the four trackers hardcoded into the BSV SDK (overlay-us-1, overlay-eu-1, overlay-ap-1, users.bapp.dev). BSV apps query these to find which servers host the overlay topics they need.

№ 11 Identifiable Activity

Applications and tokens with recognizable fingerprints

Twetch led identifiable activity at 2,948 transactions. Most chain activity carries no such identifier; the names below are services whose on-chain shape is recognizable from prior analysis.

Twetch 2,948dxs 2,595AIRCHIVE 2,523OYO 1,969TreeChat 866Indelible 735memo.cash 122MNEE 393D Ordi 32BSV Live Master 26mintBlue 25BSV Feed/View 3
Application Token Media / NFT
For the technical reader

Patterns are matched against a curated catalog of known protocols and application signatures: MAP tags, B:// envelopes, AIP, OPUB, ordinal mime declarations, custom STAS structures. Some come from WoC tags; others are identified through analysis. New patterns are added editorially as they emerge.

Counts are unique transactions touching each application's recognizable structures. A transaction can match more than one pattern.

№ 12 Script of the Day

Programmable Contract

CONTRACT · selected from 78,460 candidates

Programmable Contract with a 101-byte payload

What it does. This script uses conditional logic (OP_IF/OP_ELSE), byte manipulation (OP_SPLIT/OP_CAT), or hash operations to enforce spending conditions beyond simple signature verification.

Why it matters. Demonstrates BSV's full scripting capability for programmable money and stateful applications.

TX 7e4b87f492… Block 970,886 101 script bytes
Opcodes used
DROPCHECKSIG
Script preview
38346230366136666661346136353337623062306662626239636439316234383466383134373338643131623538643133386139643431373864323566376362 OP_DROP 0346fc70f9162c508a0c9cfc7585aaa2b9cbf9e4599888f972b53d81cfc789db18 OP_CHECKSIG
Skeleton
<DATA> OP_DROP <DATA> OP_CHECKSIG
For the technical reader

Selection is editorial: one script per day from a curated category (Data Carrier, Token Mint, Complex Contract, Hash Puzzle, etc.). Candidate count shows how many similar scripts appeared in the same window.

The script preview above is the actual on-chain ASM (truncated for display); the skeleton normalizes pushes to <DATA> for pattern comparison across transactions. Opcodes shown are the unique ones present in the script, not the sequence order.

Support BSV Intel
Every classification in this brief came from a query I wrote, on infrastructure I built. If it's useful to you, sats keep it shipping.
HandCash $bridget33
BSV address 177bRhNJAioCgMyYCaKTJpauXpgHnUfWnK
Telegram @bsvintel_bot
send /subscribe for daily updates