BSV Intel the signal, daily
Edition 194
Monday · September 14, 2026
BSV Network · 24 hours ending September 14, 09:20 UTC

Edition 194

Edited by Bridget Doran · Scanned 09:32 UTC, September 14 · Blocks 966,570 → 966,713 · 1,051,139 transactions
Largest move
$1.28M
75,139 BSV · whale tier
Avg block time
9.4min
near schedule
Throughput
13tx/s
peak 703 tx/s
BSV price
$17.01
▲ 0.1% · 24h
№ 01 Chain Health

9 pools, on schedule

9 pools produced today's 144 blocks at an average interval of 9.4 min — on schedule relative to the 10-minute target.

7.1 min
Median interval
half the blocks faster
59
Fast blocks1
under 5 min
421,854 txs
Busiest block
block 966,578
Fast and slow blocks are an expected feature of Proof of Work, not a defect. Block timing follows a Poisson process (random spacing around a steady average), so clusters of fast or slow blocks happen even when hashrate is unchanged.
Block cadence · 144 blocks · 22.3h
Fast (<5 min) · 59 Normal · 68 Slow (>20 min) · 17
For the technical reader

Block timing. Mean interval 561.7 seconds (9.4 min) over 143 measured intervals across 144 blocks; median 424 seconds (7.1 min). Range 3 s to 2611 s (43.5 min).

Cadence. Average interval 9.4 min — on schedule relative to the 10-minute target. 9 pools produced today's blocks.

Largest block. Block 966,578 at 421,854 transactions, the peak load in the window. Avg tx/block across all 144 blocks was 7,300.

№ 02 Teranode Network

5 Teranode operators visible on the public network

At least 5 operators are announcing on the public gossip network (2 acting as public relays), running versions from v0.15.6 to v0.16.0-beta-11. This is the publicly-visible set only; others almost certainly run Teranode without announcing.

5
Visible
announcing on mesh
2
Public relays
accept external tx
5
Caught up → tip
synced to latest block
Versions in use · 5 operators
v0.15.6 2 · v0.15.9-beta-2 2 · v0.16.0-beta-11 1
For the technical reader

Source: node_status messages on the public BSV gossip layer, observed by our own libp2p listener and deduplicated by peer ID. This counts the publicly-announcing set only — a node that does not broadcast status, or runs inside a private cluster, will not appear, so read it as a floor, not a full census.

“Caught up” means within one block of the chain tip (currently 966,719). Stalled or still-syncing nodes are excluded from that count. “Public relay” here means a node that publicly forwards gossip to the rest of the mesh; only two do, and both announce under the same operator label and share infrastructure, so the public mesh’s reachability appears to lean on a single operator.

№ 03 Mining Distribution

9 pools produced today's 144 blocks

Mining-Dutch led at 18.8%. Distribution within normal range.

Mining-Dutch 18.8%
taal.com 16.7%
CUVVE 15.3%
qdlnk 12.5%
GorillaPool 9%
SA100 8.3%
Kryptex 7.6%
molepool.com 5.6%
Bitofsin 4.2%
unknown 2.1%
For the technical reader

Pool identification is by coinbase signature; pools that don't sign or use unrecognized tags appear as untagged producers. The _Teranode suffix (e.g., taal.com_Teranode) marks blocks attributed to a pool running the Teranode node software — based on observable signals in the block data, not a formal protocol marker. GorillaPool.io may also be running a Teranode (observed in the Teranode explorer); when blocks become attributable to that node, they would appear with the suffix as well.

Block counts: Mining-Dutch 27, taal.com 24, CUVVE 22, qdlnk 18, GorillaPool 13, SA100 12, Kryptex 11, molepool.com 8, Bitofsin 6, unknown 3. 141 of 144 blocks identified.

№ 04 Capital Flow

128 movements crossed the chain

5 of them moved more than 10,000 BSV, a combined ~$2.2 million at today's price.

5
Major
> 10K BSV
~$170,100+
10
Notable
1K – 10K BSV
~$17,010 – 170,100
113
Significant
100 – 1K BSV
~$1,701 – 17,010
Top movements
75,138.54BSV
≈ $1,278,106 526aadc0e4…
2 → 2 Neutral
14,345.59BSV
≈ $244,018 2c20aef5df…
1 → 2 Neutral
14,254.98BSV
≈ $242,477 7b92c501b2…
1 → 2 Neutral
13,156.81BSV
≈ $223,797 1b4907c2b3…
1 → 3 Neutral
For the technical reader

Tier thresholds. Major > 10K BSV; Notable 1K – 10K BSV; Significant 100 – 1K BSV. Counts are unique transactions in the 24-hour window moving value within these bands; the 100-BSV floor excludes ordinary day-to-day payments.

Shape is input-count → output-count. Pattern is heuristic:

Neutral: typical payment shape (1→2 or 2→2, one payment + change).
Consolidation: many inputs, few outputs (UTXO cleanup or sweep).
Distribution: few inputs, many outputs (payouts, faucet, batch send).

№ 05 Address Intelligence

67 tracked addresses across 197 days

6 new addresses on the radar today. (what does this mean?)

New to the radar
1LXvFYFxBASpWRRHCi… 75,139 BSV First appearance
1HuYGzVCLNgr6L4Bef… 14,346 BSV First appearance
193i1r6YXUb9FdhYf5… 14,255 BSV First appearance
Recurring addresses
Address Behavior Confidence Active
7,983,819 BSV · 403 txs
Exchange-Like High 03-04 → 09-13
5,461,812 BSV · 176 txs
Exchange-Like High 03-02 → 09-14
2,775,220 BSV · 133 txs
Exchange-Like High 03-02 → 08-19
17,247,877 BSV · 111 txs
Exchange-Like High 03-08 → 09-14
0 BSV · 110 txs
Accumulator High 03-08 → 09-14
How to read this

New to the radar flags addresses from today's top whale movements that have not appeared in any whale-tier transaction during the observation window. This could indicate a new large holder, a previously sub-threshold address crossing into whale territory, or a long-dormant address reactivating.

Recurring addresses are identified by tracking output scripts across all whale transactions (≥ 100 BSV) over the full 197-day observation window. An address appearing here has been involved in large-value movements on multiple separate days.

Behavior is based on whether an address predominantly receives (Accumulator), predominantly sends (Distributor), or does both in roughly equal measure (Exchange-Like).

Confidence reflects how many indicators align: transaction frequency, directional balance, and tier presence. High = 3+ indicators; Medium = 2; Low = 1.

All classifications are probabilistic. No identity or ownership claims are made. Addresses are derived from transaction output scripts.

№ 06 Throughput & Market
BSV / USD
$17.01
▲ 0.1% over 24h
Throughput, avg
13tx/s
peak 703 tx/s · 10-min window
Avg tx / block7,300
Max tx / block421,854
Total transactions1,051,139
10-min peak421,854
For the technical reader

TPS is computed over the 22.3 hours of the scan window in 10-minute intervals, not per block. The peak is the busiest 10-minute window observed (421,854 transactions, ≈ 703 tx/s for that window).

Price source: real-time quote at scan completion. 24h change is from a rolling 24-hour spot reference.

№ 07 Transaction Velocity

Activity by hour, across 24 hours

1,051,139 transactions mapped to 10-minute windows. The brightest cell is the busiest window of the day.

111417202302050810:00:10:20:30:40:5011:00 UTC — 764 txs11:10 UTC — 14 txs11:20 UTC — 0 txs11:30 UTC — 0 txs11:40 UTC — 0 txs11:50 UTC — 1,696 txs12:00 UTC — 128 txs12:10 UTC — 0 txs12:20 UTC — 719 txs12:30 UTC — 0 txs12:40 UTC — 0 txs12:50 UTC — 421,854 txs422k13:00 UTC — 80,019 txs13:10 UTC — 0 txs13:20 UTC — 523 txs13:30 UTC — 793 txs13:40 UTC — 247 txs13:50 UTC — 470 txs14:00 UTC — 451 txs14:10 UTC — 821 txs14:20 UTC — 169 txs14:30 UTC — 0 txs14:40 UTC — 0 txs14:50 UTC — 734 txs15:00 UTC — 414 txs15:10 UTC — 0 txs15:20 UTC — 0 txs15:30 UTC — 1,121 txs15:40 UTC — 298 txs15:50 UTC — 200 txs16:00 UTC — 50,579 txs16:10 UTC — 424 txs16:20 UTC — 0 txs16:30 UTC — 0 txs16:40 UTC — 1,251 txs16:50 UTC — 116 txs17:00 UTC — 254 txs17:10 UTC — 17,087 txs17:20 UTC — 34,136 txs17:30 UTC — 869 txs17:40 UTC — 0 txs17:50 UTC — 30 txs18:00 UTC — 132,137 txs18:10 UTC — 89,105 txs18:20 UTC — 82,270 txs18:30 UTC — 0 txs18:40 UTC — 62,720 txs18:50 UTC — 2,686 txs19:00 UTC — 721 txs19:10 UTC — 0 txs19:20 UTC — 492 txs19:30 UTC — 0 txs19:40 UTC — 0 txs19:50 UTC — 26,203 txs20:00 UTC — 0 txs20:10 UTC — 838 txs20:20 UTC — 182 txs20:30 UTC — 619 txs20:40 UTC — 593 txs20:50 UTC — 286 txs21:00 UTC — 354 txs21:10 UTC — 429 txs21:20 UTC — 460 txs21:30 UTC — 14 txs21:40 UTC — 0 txs21:50 UTC — 1,057 txs22:00 UTC — 131 txs22:10 UTC — 447 txs22:20 UTC — 0 txs22:30 UTC — 389 txs22:40 UTC — 436 txs22:50 UTC — 22 txs23:00 UTC — 1,227 txs23:10 UTC — 5 txs23:20 UTC — 4,858 txs23:30 UTC — 485 txs23:40 UTC — 450 txs23:50 UTC — 53 txs00:00 UTC — 0 txs00:10 UTC — 0 txs00:20 UTC — 2,756 txs00:30 UTC — 0 txs00:40 UTC — 626 txs00:50 UTC — 0 txs01:00 UTC — 371 txs01:10 UTC — 345 txs01:20 UTC — 307 txs01:30 UTC — 241 txs01:40 UTC — 0 txs01:50 UTC — 704 txs02:00 UTC — 503 txs02:10 UTC — 260 txs02:20 UTC — 872 txs02:30 UTC — 0 txs02:40 UTC — 0 txs02:50 UTC — 1,529 txs03:00 UTC — 0 txs03:10 UTC — 0 txs03:20 UTC — 716 txs03:30 UTC — 0 txs03:40 UTC — 480 txs03:50 UTC — 0 txs04:00 UTC — 453 txs04:10 UTC — 12 txs04:20 UTC — 822 txs04:30 UTC — 0 txs04:40 UTC — 789 txs04:50 UTC — 144 txs05:00 UTC — 715 txs05:10 UTC — 468 txs05:20 UTC — 0 txs05:30 UTC — 894 txs05:40 UTC — 0 txs05:50 UTC — 410 txs06:00 UTC — 12 txs06:10 UTC — 0 txs06:20 UTC — 1,319 txs06:30 UTC — 295 txs06:40 UTC — 229 txs06:50 UTC — 0 txs07:00 UTC — 0 txs07:10 UTC — 971 txs07:20 UTC — 771 txs07:30 UTC — 0 txs07:40 UTC — 2,770 txs07:50 UTC — 0 txs08:00 UTC — 1,003 txs08:10 UTC — 0 txs08:20 UTC — 0 txs08:30 UTC — 0 txs08:40 UTC — 1,604 txs08:50 UTC — 55 txs09:00 UTC — 977 txs09:10 UTC — 0 txs09:20 UTC — 866 txs09:30 UTC — 0 txs09:40 UTC — 0 txs09:50 UTC — 0 txs10:00 UTC — 0 txs10:10 UTC — 0 txs10:20 UTC — 0 txs10:30 UTC — 0 txs10:40 UTC — 0 txs10:50 UTC — 0 txsActivity:High
Peak 10-min window: 421,854 txs Coverage: 144 blocks · 22.3h 09-13 11:02 UTC → 09-14 09:20 UTC
For the technical reader

Dark cells indicate 10-minute windows where no block was mined: a natural result of the Poisson process governing Proof of Work.2 Transactions broadcast during those windows appear in the next mined block.

Each row = one hour of the scan. Each column = a 10-minute bucket within that hour. Read left-to-right within a row, then down to the next hour.

Poisson process. A random event process where events occur independently at a stable average rate, but with unpredictable spacing. Block times have a 10-minute average but individual intervals scatter widely; that's not a bug, it's how the math works.
№ 08 On-chain Activity

2.6 million outputs, by purpose

The TxBlaster service produced 62.6% of transactions, posting paired payment and data-publication outputs continuously. The breakdown below isolates the remaining 37.4% so other activity is readable.

A note on storage. OP_RETURN data is prunable: nodes can discard it without breaking consensus, but reading it back requires running an indexer. UTXO-resident patterns (STAS tokens, spendable metadata, ordinal envelopes) remain in the chain's state and are recoverable from any pruned node. As BSV scales, the architectural direction is toward UTXO-resident data, not OP_RETURN.
All transactions, by source
TxBlaster · 62.6%
37.4%
658,131 tx 393,008 tx · all other
Excluding TxBlaster3 · 1,243,631 outputs
Payment 35.6% 442,707
P2PKH 422,475 · P2PK 20,217 · Multisig 15
Data Publication 29.5% 367,255
OP_RETURN 367,059 · Ordinal envelopes 178 · Spendable metadata 18
Contracts & Tokens 34.87% 433,669
STAS Gen 3: 111 · Custom locking: 433,558 · 3 unique structures

Of 800,924 non-payment outputs in this window, 45.8% were prunable (OP_RETURN) and 54.2% were UTXO-resident. Pruning is permitted by consensus today but not generally practiced — the architectural advantage of UTXO-resident data materializes as throughput scales toward Teranode-class capacity.

Method · how non-payment outputs are embedded
OP_RETURN 367,059Spendable metadata 18Ordinal envelope 178STAS Gen 3 111Custom locking 433,558
TxBlaster is an identified, automated service that posts paired P2PK + OP_RETURN transactions continuously. We count it separately not because it's less legitimate (every fee-paid valid transaction is real chain activity), but because at 63% of transaction count today, it would visually overwhelm everything else. The numbers above show what the other activity looks like.
For the technical reader

Purpose classifies outputs by what they're locked to:

Payment: P2PKH, P2PK, multisig (spendable value).
Data Publication: OP_RETURN, ordinal envelopes, spendable metadata (carrying data).
Contracts: STAS tokens, custom locking scripts (programmable spend conditions).

Spendable metadata (heuristic): scripts with signature verification followed by data removed via OP_DROP. Metadata isn't consumed by validation logic but remains on-chain in the UTXO set.

Unique structures: a contract structure is a normalized script skeleton with variable data (hashes, signatures, pubkeys) removed. 3 unique structures observed today across 433,669 contract outputs.

№ 09 Protocols & Content

What people published, and how it was framed

Open standards used to format data on-chain, and the MIME types declared in those publications.

Protocol · open standards defining data format
MAP 2,995B:// 1,872AIP 1,8401Sat-Ordinal 179Metanet4 36BSV-21 24STAS 18BAP 3
Metanet (the original). The 2018-2019 nChain protocol: a 4-byte "meta" push in OP_RETURN that defines a DAG of parent-txid-linked records. Not to be confused with the newer BRC-100 "Metanet" wallet/overlay ecosystem, which uses the same word for a different thing.
Content Type · MIME types in declared inscriptions
text/markdown 1,311text/plain 330image/webp 143image/jpeg 100image/png 86application/json 28application/bsv-20 24text/html 9
For the technical reader

Content Types are MIME declarations sourced from two structures: ordinal envelopes (1Sat-style spendable inscriptions) and B:// protocol OP_RETURN publications. Outputs that don't declare a MIME type aren't counted here.

application/bsv-20 covers both BSV-20 and BSV-21: both protocols declare "p":"bsv-20" in their JSON and most inscriptions inherit the legacy MIME type. Protocol differentiation happens via JSON fields (tick = BSV-20 ticker mode; sym/id = BSV-21 tickerless mode).

№ 10 Overlay Directory

151 SHIP endpoints · 144 SLAP endpoints

BRC-88 topic registrations announce who is hosting which overlay services on chain.

SHIP · intake side
151endpoints
across 88 topics
SLAP · query side
144endpoints
across 82 topics
Top topic managers · SHIP (of 88)
tm_template 18tm_plite 15tm_uhrp 12tm_users 11tm_identity 10
Top lookup services · SLAP (of 82)
ls_template 17ls_uhrp 11ls_identity 10ls_users 10ls_plite 10
Directory topics tm_ship (27) · tm_slap (27) · ls_ship (25) · ls_slap (25)
For the technical reader

BRC-88 SHIP/SLAP. Topic registrations on chain that announce which overlay services a node hosts. SHIP is the intake side (which topics this node accepts); SLAP is the query side (which topics this node can answer for).

endpoints = unique (URL, identity key) pairs. advertisements = signed unspent UTXOs on chain, each declaring one endpoint hosts one topic. topics = named overlay services like tm_uhrp or ls_ship.

Snapshot from 2026-09-14 11:15 UTC. Counts come from the four trackers hardcoded into the BSV SDK (overlay-us-1, overlay-eu-1, overlay-ap-1, users.bapp.dev). BSV apps query these to find which servers host the overlay topics they need.

№ 11 Identifiable Activity

Applications and tokens with recognizable fingerprints

Teragun led identifiable activity at 342,008 transactions. Most chain activity carries no such identifier; the names below are services whose on-chain shape is recognizable from prior analysis.

Teragun 342,008AIRCHIVE 14,269TreeChat 1,587Indelible 1,465Twetch 1,223dxs 760OYO 6563D Ordi 78MNEE 24mintBlue 9memo.cash 7CASHEIO 1
Application Token Media / NFT
For the technical reader

Patterns are matched against a curated catalog of known protocols and application signatures: MAP tags, B:// envelopes, AIP, OPUB, ordinal mime declarations, custom STAS structures. Some come from WoC tags; others are identified through analysis. New patterns are added editorially as they emerge.

Counts are unique transactions touching each application's recognizable structures. A transaction can match more than one pattern.

№ 12 Script of the Day

Programmable Contract

CONTRACT · selected from 433,558 candidates

Programmable Contract with a 174-byte payload

What it does. This script uses conditional logic (OP_IF/OP_ELSE), byte manipulation (OP_SPLIT/OP_CAT), or hash operations to enforce spending conditions beyond simple signature verification.

Why it matters. Demonstrates BSV's full scripting capability for programmable money and stateful applications.

TX 03e9d6b003… Block 966,570 174 script bytes
Opcodes used
2DROPDROPDUPHASH160EQUALVERIFYCHECKSIG
Script preview
a5 b96e9501a053cd89c8d9047a60da355a25d487abbf4695b21db88d3140db756d00000000 d2256caebe71fa8a86403beff33ca9d97c46eaa744db9cd26960bee182a882e103000000 b96e9501a053cd89c8d9047a60da355a25d487abbf4695b21db88d3140db756d01000000 3f11010000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 OP_2DROP OP_2
Skeleton
a5 <DATA> <DATA> <DATA> <DATA> OP_2DROP OP_2DROP OP_DROP OP_DUP OP_HASH160 <DATA> OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG
For the technical reader

Selection is editorial: one script per day from a curated category (Data Carrier, Token Mint, Complex Contract, Hash Puzzle, etc.). Candidate count shows how many similar scripts appeared in the same window.

The script preview above is the actual on-chain ASM (truncated for display); the skeleton normalizes pushes to <DATA> for pattern comparison across transactions. Opcodes shown are the unique ones present in the script, not the sequence order.

Support BSV Intel
Every classification in this brief came from a query I wrote, on infrastructure I built. If it's useful to you, sats keep it shipping.
HandCash $bridget33
BSV address 177bRhNJAioCgMyYCaKTJpauXpgHnUfWnK
Telegram @bsvintel_bot
send /subscribe for daily updates