BSV Intel the signal, daily
Edition 160
Monday · August 10, 2026
BSV Network · 24 hours ending August 10, 09:28 UTC

Edition 160

Edited by Bridget Doran · Scanned 09:33 UTC, August 10 · Blocks 961,549 → 961,692 · 1,249,317 transactions
Largest move
$1.05M
71,678 BSV · whale tier
Avg block time
9min
near schedule
Throughput
16tx/s
peak 377 tx/s
BSV price
$14.64
▲ 0.4% · 24h
№ 01 Chain Health

9 pools, on schedule

9 pools produced today's 144 blocks at an average interval of 9 min — on schedule relative to the 10-minute target.

6 min
Median interval
half the blocks faster
64
Fast blocks1
under 5 min
224,570 txs
Busiest block
block 961,610
Fast and slow blocks are an expected feature of Proof of Work, not a defect. Block timing follows a Poisson process (random spacing around a steady average), so clusters of fast or slow blocks happen even when hashrate is unchanged.
Block cadence · 144 blocks · 21.3h
Fast (<5 min) · 64 Normal · 63 Slow (>20 min) · 17
For the technical reader

Block timing. Mean interval 539.5 seconds (9 min) over 142 measured intervals across 144 blocks; median 360 seconds (6 min). Range 5 s to 4335 s (72.3 min).

Cadence. Average interval 9 min — on schedule relative to the 10-minute target. 9 pools produced today's blocks.

Largest block. Block 961,610 at 224,570 transactions, the peak load in the window. Avg tx/block across all 144 blocks was 8,676.

№ 02 Teranode Network

9 Teranode operators visible on the public network

At least 9 operators are announcing on the public gossip network (2 acting as public relays), running versions from v0.13.1 to v0.16.0-beta-11. This is the publicly-visible set only; others almost certainly run Teranode without announcing.

9
Visible
announcing on mesh
2
Public relays
accept external tx
7
Caught up → tip
synced to latest block
Versions in use · 9 operators
v0.13.1 1 · v0.15.1 1 · v0.15.6 3 · v0.15.8-beta-2 3 · v0.16.0-beta-11 1
For the technical reader

Source: node_status messages on the public BSV gossip layer, observed by our own libp2p listener and deduplicated by peer ID. This counts the publicly-announcing set only — a node that does not broadcast status, or runs inside a private cluster, will not appear, so read it as a floor, not a full census.

“Caught up” means within one block of the chain tip (currently 961,699). Stalled or still-syncing nodes are excluded from that count. “Public relay” here means a node that publicly forwards gossip to the rest of the mesh; only two do, and both announce under the same operator label and share infrastructure, so the public mesh’s reachability appears to lean on a single operator.

№ 03 Mining Distribution

9 pools produced today's 144 blocks

Mining-Dutch led at 32.6%. Distribution within normal range.

Mining-Dutch 32.6%
SA100 18.8%
CUVVE 11.8%
qdlnk 9.7%
taal.com 8.3%
GorillaPool 7.6%
Kryptex 6.3%
taal.com_Teranode 2.8%
unknown 1.4%
Bitofsin 0.7%
For the technical reader

Pool identification is by coinbase signature; pools that don't sign or use unrecognized tags appear as untagged producers. The _Teranode suffix (e.g., taal.com_Teranode) marks blocks attributed to a pool running the Teranode node software — based on observable signals in the block data, not a formal protocol marker. GorillaPool.io may also be running a Teranode (observed in the Teranode explorer); when blocks become attributable to that node, they would appear with the suffix as well.

Block counts: Mining-Dutch 47, SA100 27, CUVVE 17, qdlnk 14, taal.com 12, GorillaPool 11, Kryptex 9, taal.com_Teranode 4, unknown 2, Bitofsin 1. 142 of 144 blocks identified.

№ 04 Capital Flow

150 movements crossed the chain

1 of them moved more than 10,000 BSV, a combined ~$1.0 million at today's price.

1
Major
> 10K BSV
~$146,400+
22
Notable
1K – 10K BSV
~$14,640 – 146,400
127
Significant
100 – 1K BSV
~$1,464 – 14,640
Top movements
71,677.61BSV
≈ $1,049,360 49a655812d…
2 → 2 Neutral
4,666.67BSV
≈ $68,320 63944dc5c5…
1 → 2 Neutral
4,436.70BSV
≈ $64,953 62bf5c729f…
1 → 2 Neutral
4,219.83BSV
≈ $61,778 5f9cf40c1c…
1 → 2 Neutral
For the technical reader

Tier thresholds. Major > 10K BSV; Notable 1K – 10K BSV; Significant 100 – 1K BSV. Counts are unique transactions in the 24-hour window moving value within these bands; the 100-BSV floor excludes ordinary day-to-day payments.

Shape is input-count → output-count. Pattern is heuristic:

Neutral: typical payment shape (1→2 or 2→2, one payment + change).
Consolidation: many inputs, few outputs (UTXO cleanup or sweep).
Distribution: few inputs, many outputs (payouts, faucet, batch send).

№ 05 Address Intelligence

69 tracked addresses across 162 days

4 new addresses on the radar today. (what does this mean?)

New to the radar
17wGvMYDnndwzyr2oj… 71,678 BSV First appearance
1Hws7UeAexUXy511vF… 4,220 BSV First appearance
1Hws7UeAexUXy511vF… 2,609 BSV First appearance
Recurring addresses
Address Behavior Confidence Active
7,027,948 BSV · 315 txs
Exchange-Like High 03-04 → 08-10
2,693,307 BSV · 122 txs
Exchange-Like High 03-02 → 08-10
3,069,162 BSV · 119 txs
Exchange-Like High 03-02 → 08-03
13,964,076 BSV · 90 txs
Exchange-Like High 03-08 → 08-10
0 BSV · 89 txs
Accumulator High 03-08 → 08-10
How to read this

New to the radar flags addresses from today's top whale movements that have not appeared in any whale-tier transaction during the observation window. This could indicate a new large holder, a previously sub-threshold address crossing into whale territory, or a long-dormant address reactivating.

Recurring addresses are identified by tracking output scripts across all whale transactions (≥ 100 BSV) over the full 162-day observation window. An address appearing here has been involved in large-value movements on multiple separate days.

Behavior is based on whether an address predominantly receives (Accumulator), predominantly sends (Distributor), or does both in roughly equal measure (Exchange-Like).

Confidence reflects how many indicators align: transaction frequency, directional balance, and tier presence. High = 3+ indicators; Medium = 2; Low = 1.

All classifications are probabilistic. No identity or ownership claims are made. Addresses are derived from transaction output scripts.

№ 06 Throughput & Market
BSV / USD
$14.64
▲ 0.4% over 24h
Throughput, avg
16tx/s
peak 377 tx/s · 10-min window
Avg tx / block8,676
Max tx / block224,570
Total transactions1,249,317
10-min peak226,495
For the technical reader

TPS is computed over the 21.3 hours of the scan window in 10-minute intervals, not per block. The peak is the busiest 10-minute window observed (226,495 transactions, ≈ 377 tx/s for that window).

Price source: real-time quote at scan completion. 24h change is from a rolling 24-hour spot reference.

№ 07 Transaction Velocity

Activity by hour, across 23 hours

1,249,317 transactions mapped to 10-minute windows. The brightest cell is the busiest window of the day.

121518210003060910:00:10:20:30:40:5012:00 UTC — 0 txs12:10 UTC — 161 txs12:20 UTC — 178 txs12:30 UTC — 468 txs12:40 UTC — 39 txs12:50 UTC — 348 txs13:00 UTC — 0 txs13:10 UTC — 598 txs13:20 UTC — 20,812 txs13:30 UTC — 479 txs13:40 UTC — 0 txs13:50 UTC — 317 txs14:00 UTC — 438 txs14:10 UTC — 529 txs14:20 UTC — 1,358 txs14:30 UTC — 0 txs14:40 UTC — 0 txs14:50 UTC — 15,336 txs15:00 UTC — 4,827 txs15:10 UTC — 3,590 txs15:20 UTC — 3,130 txs15:30 UTC — 3,783 txs15:40 UTC — 2,250 txs15:50 UTC — 1,878 txs16:00 UTC — 0 txs16:10 UTC — 1,244 txs16:20 UTC — 0 txs16:30 UTC — 145,951 txs146k16:40 UTC — 21 txs16:50 UTC — 117,708 txs118k17:00 UTC — 79,700 txs17:10 UTC — 73,985 txs17:20 UTC — 14,592 txs17:30 UTC — 0 txs17:40 UTC — 19,336 txs17:50 UTC — 0 txs18:00 UTC — 0 txs18:10 UTC — 0 txs18:20 UTC — 4,787 txs18:30 UTC — 884 txs18:40 UTC — 14 txs18:50 UTC — 3,355 txs19:00 UTC — 409 txs19:10 UTC — 0 txs19:20 UTC — 0 txs19:30 UTC — 14,536 txs19:40 UTC — 1,262 txs19:50 UTC — 0 txs20:00 UTC — 1,779 txs20:10 UTC — 0 txs20:20 UTC — 3,992 txs20:30 UTC — 0 txs20:40 UTC — 54,272 txs20:50 UTC — 0 txs21:00 UTC — 0 txs21:10 UTC — 56 txs21:20 UTC — 154,931 txs155k21:30 UTC — 0 txs21:40 UTC — 22 txs21:50 UTC — 226,495 txs226k22:00 UTC — 0 txs22:10 UTC — 4,974 txs22:20 UTC — 3,087 txs22:30 UTC — 0 txs22:40 UTC — 7,927 txs22:50 UTC — 0 txs23:00 UTC — 0 txs23:10 UTC — 0 txs23:20 UTC — 0 txs23:30 UTC — 0 txs23:40 UTC — 0 txs23:50 UTC — 27,360 txs00:00 UTC — 0 txs00:10 UTC — 0 txs00:20 UTC — 0 txs00:30 UTC — 15,920 txs00:40 UTC — 2,554 txs00:50 UTC — 0 txs01:00 UTC — 8,710 txs01:10 UTC — 2,218 txs01:20 UTC — 3,973 txs01:30 UTC — 672 txs01:40 UTC — 0 txs01:50 UTC — 3,954 txs02:00 UTC — 2,104 txs02:10 UTC — 4,796 txs02:20 UTC — 4,485 txs02:30 UTC — 0 txs02:40 UTC — 8,167 txs02:50 UTC — 3,209 txs03:00 UTC — 6,208 txs03:10 UTC — 0 txs03:20 UTC — 4,955 txs03:30 UTC — 3,835 txs03:40 UTC — 1,212 txs03:50 UTC — 7,301 txs04:00 UTC — 2,379 txs04:10 UTC — 0 txs04:20 UTC — 7,288 txs04:30 UTC — 4,482 txs04:40 UTC — 1,853 txs04:50 UTC — 2,298 txs05:00 UTC — 6,462 txs05:10 UTC — 3,306 txs05:20 UTC — 696 txs05:30 UTC — 0 txs05:40 UTC — 0 txs05:50 UTC — 21,007 txs06:00 UTC — 0 txs06:10 UTC — 0 txs06:20 UTC — 0 txs06:30 UTC — 17,634 txs06:40 UTC — 2,926 txs06:50 UTC — 6,845 txs07:00 UTC — 0 txs07:10 UTC — 7,060 txs07:20 UTC — 0 txs07:30 UTC — 10,227 txs07:40 UTC — 0 txs07:50 UTC — 10,240 txs08:00 UTC — 2,893 txs08:10 UTC — 2,195 txs08:20 UTC — 0 txs08:30 UTC — 8,326 txs08:40 UTC — 0 txs08:50 UTC — 7,676 txs09:00 UTC — 4,028 txs09:10 UTC — 5,132 txs09:20 UTC — 6,893 txs09:30 UTC — 0 txs09:40 UTC — 0 txs09:50 UTC — 0 txs10:00 UTC — 0 txs10:10 UTC — 0 txs10:20 UTC — 0 txs10:30 UTC — 0 txs10:40 UTC — 0 txs10:50 UTC — 0 txsActivity:High
Peak 10-min window: 226,495 txs Coverage: 144 blocks · 21.3h 08-09 12:13 UTC → 08-10 09:28 UTC
For the technical reader

Dark cells indicate 10-minute windows where no block was mined: a natural result of the Poisson process governing Proof of Work.2 Transactions broadcast during those windows appear in the next mined block.

Each row = one hour of the scan. Each column = a 10-minute bucket within that hour. Read left-to-right within a row, then down to the next hour.

Poisson process. A random event process where events occur independently at a stable average rate, but with unpredictable spacing. Block times have a 10-minute average but individual intervals scatter widely; that's not a bug, it's how the math works.
№ 08 On-chain Activity

2.7 million outputs, by purpose

The TxBlaster service produced 66.5% of transactions, posting paired payment and data-publication outputs continuously. The breakdown below isolates the remaining 33.5% so other activity is readable.

A note on storage. OP_RETURN data is prunable: nodes can discard it without breaking consensus, but reading it back requires running an indexer. UTXO-resident patterns (STAS tokens, spendable metadata, ordinal envelopes) remain in the chain's state and are recoverable from any pruned node. As BSV scales, the architectural direction is toward UTXO-resident data, not OP_RETURN.
All transactions, by source
TxBlaster · 66.5%
33.5%
830,205 tx 419,112 tx · all other
Excluding TxBlaster3 · 1,035,264 outputs
Payment 65.1% 674,366
P2PKH 671,807 · P2PK 2,551 · Multisig 8
Data Publication 34.7% 359,516
OP_RETURN 359,051 · Ordinal envelopes 284 · Spendable metadata 181
Contracts & Tokens 0.13% 1,382
STAS Gen 3: 45 · Custom locking: 1,337 · 17 unique structures

Of 360,898 non-payment outputs in this window, 99.5% were prunable (OP_RETURN) and 0.5% were UTXO-resident. Pruning is permitted by consensus today but not generally practiced — the architectural advantage of UTXO-resident data materializes as throughput scales toward Teranode-class capacity.

Method · how non-payment outputs are embedded
OP_RETURN 359,051Spendable metadata 181Ordinal envelope 284STAS Gen 3 45Custom locking 1,337
TxBlaster is an identified, automated service that posts paired P2PK + OP_RETURN transactions continuously. We count it separately not because it's less legitimate (every fee-paid valid transaction is real chain activity), but because at 66% of transaction count today, it would visually overwhelm everything else. The numbers above show what the other activity looks like.
For the technical reader

Purpose classifies outputs by what they're locked to:

Payment: P2PKH, P2PK, multisig (spendable value).
Data Publication: OP_RETURN, ordinal envelopes, spendable metadata (carrying data).
Contracts: STAS tokens, custom locking scripts (programmable spend conditions).

Spendable metadata (heuristic): scripts with signature verification followed by data removed via OP_DROP. Metadata isn't consumed by validation logic but remains on-chain in the UTXO set.

Unique structures: a contract structure is a normalized script skeleton with variable data (hashes, signatures, pubkeys) removed. 17 unique structures observed today across 1,382 contract outputs.

№ 09 Protocols & Content

What people published, and how it was framed

Open standards used to format data on-chain, and the MIME types declared in those publications.

Protocol · open standards defining data format
MAP 3,774AIP 2,895B:// 2,385Metanet4 1,7481Sat-Ordinal 285BSV-21 153OPUB 9STAS 9
Metanet (the original). The 2018-2019 nChain protocol: a 4-byte "meta" push in OP_RETURN that defines a DAG of parent-txid-linked records. Not to be confused with the newer BRC-100 "Metanet" wallet/overlay ecosystem, which uses the same word for a different thing.
Content Type · MIME types in declared inscriptions
text/markdown 1,875text/plain 255image/webp 197application/bsv-20 153image/jpeg 90application/json 40text/html 26image/png 19
For the technical reader

Content Types are MIME declarations sourced from two structures: ordinal envelopes (1Sat-style spendable inscriptions) and B:// protocol OP_RETURN publications. Outputs that don't declare a MIME type aren't counted here.

application/bsv-20 covers both BSV-20 and BSV-21: both protocols declare "p":"bsv-20" in their JSON and most inscriptions inherit the legacy MIME type. Protocol differentiation happens via JSON fields (tick = BSV-20 ticker mode; sym/id = BSV-21 tickerless mode).

№ 10 Overlay Directory

119 SHIP endpoints · 127 SLAP endpoints

BRC-88 topic registrations announce who is hosting which overlay services on chain.

SHIP · intake side
119endpoints
across 84 topics
SLAP · query side
127endpoints
across 85 topics
Top topic managers · SHIP (of 84)
tm_plite 15tm_template 14tm_uhrp 11tm_users 9tm_identity 8
Top lookup services · SLAP (of 85)
ls_plite 15ls_template 13ls_uhrp 12ls_users 8ls_identity 8
Directory topics tm_ship (27) · tm_slap (27) · ls_ship (26) · ls_slap (26)
For the technical reader

BRC-88 SHIP/SLAP. Topic registrations on chain that announce which overlay services a node hosts. SHIP is the intake side (which topics this node accepts); SLAP is the query side (which topics this node can answer for).

endpoints = unique (URL, identity key) pairs. advertisements = signed unspent UTXOs on chain, each declaring one endpoint hosts one topic. topics = named overlay services like tm_uhrp or ls_ship.

Snapshot from 2026-08-10 11:15 UTC. Counts come from the four trackers hardcoded into the BSV SDK (overlay-us-1, overlay-eu-1, overlay-ap-1, users.bapp.dev). BSV apps query these to find which servers host the overlay topics they need.

№ 11 Identifiable Activity

Applications and tokens with recognizable fingerprints

GaiaLog led identifiable activity at 336,391 transactions. Most chain activity carries no such identifier; the names below are services whose on-chain shape is recognizable from prior analysis.

GaiaLog 336,391AIRCHIVE 13,234Twetch 2,437TreeChat 1,191dxs 288MNEE 92Indelible 703D Ordi 59OYO 30BSV Live Master 23CASHEIO 16mintBlue 4memo.cash 3
Application Token Media / NFT
For the technical reader

Patterns are matched against a curated catalog of known protocols and application signatures: MAP tags, B:// envelopes, AIP, OPUB, ordinal mime declarations, custom STAS structures. Some come from WoC tags; others are identified through analysis. New patterns are added editorially as they emerge.

Counts are unique transactions touching each application's recognizable structures. A transaction can match more than one pattern.

№ 12 Script of the Day

Programmable Contract

CONTRACT · selected from 1,337 candidates

Programmable Contract with a 133-byte payload

What it does. This script uses conditional logic (OP_IF/OP_ELSE), byte manipulation (OP_SPLIT/OP_CAT), or hash operations to enforce spending conditions beyond simple signature verification.

Why it matters. Demonstrates BSV's full scripting capability for programmable money and stateful applications.

TX a387b23c2e… Block 961,549 133 script bytes
Opcodes used
DROPCHECKSIG
Script preview
5955524147497c76317c6561306461333630303335317c313031353230307c30373362313934363263363132346637396332373635383237326161396537323939646634663835633862386339356236626664373436626662303836376363 OP_DROP 035f2a88748aa6ceff9512d1b376fd6e3536ad8d67224bd8e628574a19635563cc OP_CHECKSIG
Skeleton
<DATA> OP_DROP <DATA> OP_CHECKSIG
For the technical reader

Selection is editorial: one script per day from a curated category (Data Carrier, Token Mint, Complex Contract, Hash Puzzle, etc.). Candidate count shows how many similar scripts appeared in the same window.

The script preview above is the actual on-chain ASM (truncated for display); the skeleton normalizes pushes to <DATA> for pattern comparison across transactions. Opcodes shown are the unique ones present in the script, not the sequence order.

Support BSV Intel
Every classification in this brief came from a query I wrote, on infrastructure I built. If it's useful to you, sats keep it shipping.
HandCash $bridget33
BSV address 177bRhNJAioCgMyYCaKTJpauXpgHnUfWnK
Telegram @bsvintel_bot
send /subscribe for daily updates