| Amount | TX | Shape | Pattern |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40,000.00 BSV ≈ $597,400 |
2d43520cc0... | 1 → 4 | neutral |
| 25,813.91 BSV ≈ $385,531 |
166c8f800e... | 1 → 3 | neutral |
| 25,759.54 BSV ≈ $384,719 |
a212178119... | 1 → 5 | distribution |
| 25,062.16 BSV ≈ $374,303 |
b928c3f3eb... | 1 → 2 | neutral |
| 24,870.23 BSV ≈ $371,437 |
f95965e8f2... | 1 → 2 | neutral |
A Poisson process is a random event process where events occur independently at a stable average rate, but with unpredictable spacing.
Chain convergence normal. No deep reorg activity observed. Block production consistent with expected PoW cadence. The average block interval over the 24-hour window was 10.1 minutes. The network produced 61 blocks faster than 5 minutes and 17 blocks slower than 20 minutes, indicating typical variance in Proof-of-Work discovery times.
A total of 21,427 transactions were processed across 143 blocks. Block content varied, with an average of 150 transactions per block, a maximum of 1,301, and a minimum of 1. A real-time mempool snapshot shows 165 pending transactions, occupying approximately 1.4 GB. This indicates moderate demand for block space, which remains well within the network's current capacity.
The mining distribution over the past 24 hours remains decentralized, with no single entity controlling a majority of the hashrate. Full 24-hour coinbase data shows the following distribution across 143 blocks:
CUVVE: 36 blocks (25.2%)
taal.com: 28 blocks (19.6%)
molepool.com: 17 blocks (11.9%)
qdlnk: 15 blocks (10.5%)
SA100: 13 blocks (9.1%)
GorillaPool: 11 blocks (7.7%)
taal.com_Teranode: 9 blocks (6.3%)
Mining-Dutch: 9 blocks (6.3%)
/rWGFYS/: 5 blocks (3.5%)
Significant value was transferred on-chain, with 144 transactions exceeding 100 BSV. The activity was tiered as follows:
Over 10,000 BSV: 9 transactions
1,000 - 10,000 BSV: 37 transactions
100 - 1,000 BSV: 98 transactions
The largest movements included transactions of 40,000 BSV, 25,813 BSV, and 25,759 BSV. The observed patterns were primarily neutral (1-input to multiple outputs, likely including a change address) or simple distribution, suggesting coin management, internal transfers, or OTC desk activity rather than direct exchange inflows or outflows.
Analysis of 89,395 transaction outputs reveals a clear hierarchy of use cases, dominated by standard value transfer.
Purpose: PAYMENT (77.9%), DATA_PUBLICATION (15%), and CONTRACTS (7%).
Structure: The most common script structures were P2PKH (69,659), OP_RETURN (10,809), Ordinal inscriptions (2,559), and stateful contracts (6,301).
Protocols: The MAP protocol was detected in 5 transactions.
What it does: This script begins with OP_RETURN, which terminates execution and marks the output as unspendable. The remaining bytes carry arbitrary data.
Why it matters: Currently the most common method for data publication. Used by protocols like B://, MAP, AIP, and TreeChat for files, metadata, and social content.
Example TX: [fe41a9984726...](https://whatsonchain.com/tx/fe41a998472619a0b25528b5ca7938cb0feb84d09806b36dfc5706ff413e0c23) at block [940,350](https://whatsonchain.com/block/940350)
The network's node software distribution is currently split between two primary versions, indicating a need for continued monitoring for consensus alignment. The distribution across 14 connected nodes is:
/Bitcoin SV:1.2.0/: 6 nodes (43%)
/Bitcoin SV:1.1.0/: 6 nodes (43%)
/Bitcoin SV:1.1.1/: 2 nodes (14%)
Network stable with moderate economic activity.